On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:51:57AM +0530, . wrote: > >> That you compare tangible physical matter (Oort cloud) with the >> intangible abstract (time) is a stretch. > > You're the panta rhei guy here, not me.
Am, yes! .....but you got the gender wrong :) > who here would miss Quaoar, Haumea or Ixion? ...pass!! Have had enough of the astrological humbug here (India), so i'll reserve my comments about the effect of dwarf planets on us mortals. >> Goog for postbiota spewed a domain with m.lists run by you. Got anything >> better? > > You know, post + biota? Something that comes after biota > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biota_(ecology) > Postbiological critters. ...well biota uses a time span but am not sure how one can co-relate that to the destruction of time itself, especially when it cannot be regenerated like a biological organism (call it biota if you like). To you time != destruction since it 'lacks a measurement process' but it does for me, so i can agree to disagree on this. > Oh, and it's not my fault if you never coined a word. No need to get rude. Am not ! As for coining words, its a lot more fun and more complicated in languages other than English. -- .
