On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > Which begs the question, will we need "veg biodeisel" now? Or will
Forget biodiesel. An ERO(E)I of 3:1 is not worthile, even not considered the awful ecological footprint. > non-meat-eaters be OK with it since it's just another way of handling > waste; no one's raising the animals just to be able to process them into > fuel. Uh. At a guess you'd have a negative ERO(E)I of at least 1:100. Try just burning greenbacks for their caloric value.
