On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Alok G. Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [The study it's based on is not recent.] > The four studies in the paper I assume are of the same timeframe as the > publication of the paper -- 1999. Is that so long ago as to be outdated? > I would think that a study on human behaviour in the Iron Age would > still be relevant now. > Or was your point about non-recentness something else ? That. It was a cool study, and I enjoyed all the snarky comments when it was first published and I don't want to discourage you or anyone else from posting cool stuff (because it is cool) but at the same time I'm hoping for new cool stuff. How does one strike a balance? -- Charles
