perhaps a return to the city - states that existed in the past - Athens,
Sparta. I would agree with Deepa that electricity is the minimum - nomadic
is usually great when the economy is good; not so great when things are
going sour. the one thing I like about the nomadic existence is having
skills that translate across borders.

As for danger, from a woman's perspective, i find it hard to believe there
is such a thing as a safe place be it city or rural areas or small towns
(shades of Dogville!!)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Deepa Mohan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>  On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Giancarlo Livraghi <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Srini RamaKrishnan wrote:
>>
>> > I have been rather taken of late with the idea of leading
>> > a nomadic existence at some point in my life.
>> > It almost feels like that's what humans were meant to do.
>>
>> This is a very interesting thought.
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> In the early days of the internet, some of us believed that it would make
>> it possible to be "nomadic" without gong back to a not very comfortable
>> pre-agricultural age. And, of course, it's true.
>>
>
> I don't agree with this, either. For most of us, electricity is a must for
> communication...and very, very few of us can do without it on a permanent
> basis. How would you have a nomadic existence with dependence on it?
>
>>
>> But it isn't happening even remotely as much as it could. The monstrous
>> growth of gigantic cities in many parts of the world (especially those with
>> severe poverty) remains a tragically strong trend.
>>
>> It's sad - and dangerous. Also rather stupid.
>>
>>
> I don't know about this, Giancarlo.....We have never had such a large
> population of human beings ever...and perhaps this IS the best strategy for
> human survival...the pattern always seems to have been for humans to
> aggregate in large numbers...compared to the population then, the ancient
> cities were large groups of people.  So why do you feel that it's sad,
> dangerous, and stupid? Surely, a human being feels more secure and less
> threatened by external dangers in larger groups.
>
> Deepa.
>
>
>
>>
>

Reply via email to