Could someone who follows this more closely explain how big a leap
"wikimath" is from having these discussions on Usenet and mailing lists?
 So far as blogs go, I can see no difference at all -- the most complex
commenting systems approach the "thread-ability" of e-mail.

- Pranesh

---------

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimath.html

HIS prospects of answering one of the biggest questions in mathematics
[may be fading][1], but [Vinay Deolalikar][2] of Hewlett-Packard Labs in
Palo Alto, California, may still have made his mark. His proposed proof
of the "P versus NP" problem led to a flurry of online activity that
points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis.

 [1]: /article/dn19313-tide-turns-against-milliondollar-maths-proof.html
 [2]: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Vinay_Deolalikar/

"It was at least the catalyst for some very interesting discussion and
developments," says [Terence Tao][3] at the University of California,
Los Angeles, one of several computer scientists and mathematicians who
have raced to make sense of the proof since it [exploded onto the web
last week][4].

 [3]: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/
 [4]: /article/dn19287-p--np-its-bad-news-for-the-power-of-computing.html

Much of this activity took place on the blog of [Richard Lipton][5], a
computer scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology. A [wiki][6]
was also set up to gather opinions on the proof, which if true sets
limits on what computers can do, with implications for cryptography.

 [5]: http://www.scs.gatech.edu/people/richard-lipton
 [6]:
http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Deolalikar%27s_P!%3DNP_paper

But on 13 August, Lipton posted an [email][7] from computer scientist
[Neil Immerman][8] of the University of Massachusetts, who claimed to
have found a "serious hole" in Deolalikar's paper. Since then, the tide
has turned against the proof - although the online discussions continue.

 [7]:
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/fatal-flaws-in-deolalikars-proof/
 [8]: http://www.cs.umass.edu/~immerman/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to