On 08-Mar-12 6:45 PM, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> Or, in other words, "focus" - in the pointy-haired-boss as well as the
> Vernor Vinge senses of the term - is not necessarily going to help you
> with finding the (or even *a*) New New Thing.
> 
> Udhay
> 
> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/why-being-sleepy-and-drunk-are-great-for-creativity/

An attempt to go in the opposite direction. Very interesting.

Udhay

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328501.600-zap-your-brain-into-the-zone-fast-track-to-pure-focus.html?full=true

Zap your brain into the zone: Fast track to pure focus

    06 February 2012 by Sally Adee

Whether you want to smash a forehand like Federer, or just be an Xbox
hero, there is a shocking short cut to getting the brain of an expert

I'm close to tears behind my thin cover of sandbags as 20 screaming,
masked men run towards me at full speed, strapped into suicide bomb
vests and clutching rifles. For every one I manage to shoot dead, three
new assailants pop up from nowhere. I'm clearly not shooting fast
enough, and panic and incompetence are making me continually jam my rifle.

My salvation lies in the fact that my attackers are only a video,
projected on screens to the front and sides. It's the very simulation
that trains US troops to take their first steps with a rifle, and
everything about it has been engineered to feel like an overpowering
assault. But I am failing miserably. In fact, I'm so demoralised that
I'm tempted to put down the rifle and leave.

Then they put the electrodes on me.

I am in a lab in Carlsbad, California, in pursuit of an elusive mental
state known as "flow" - that feeling of effortless concentration that
characterises outstanding performance in all kinds of skills.

Flow has been maddeningly difficult to pin down, let alone harness, but
a wealth of new technologies could soon allow us all to conjure up this
state. The plan is to provide a short cut to virtuosity, slashing the
amount of time it takes to master a new skill - be it tennis, playing
the piano or marksmanship.

That will be welcome news to anyone embarking on the tortuous road to
expertise. According to pioneering research by Anders Ericsson at
Florida State University in Tallahassee, it normally takes 10,000 hours
of practice to become expert in any discipline. Over that time, your
brain knits together a wealth of new circuits that eventually allow you
to execute the skill automatically, without consciously considering each
action. Think of the way tennis champion Roger Federer, after years of
training, can gracefully combine a complicated series of actions -
keeping one eye on the ball and the other on his opponent, while he
lines up his shot and then despatches a crippling backhand - all in one
stunningly choreographed second.

Flow typically accompanies these actions. It involves a Zen-like feeling
of intense concentration, with time seeming to stop as you focus
completely on the activity in hand. The experience crops up repeatedly
when experts describe what it feels like to be at the top of their game,
and with years of practice it becomes second nature to enter that state.
Yet you don't have to be a pro to experience it - some people report the
same ability to focus at a far earlier stage in their training,
suggesting they are more naturally predisposed to the flow state than
others. This effortless concentration should speed up progress, while
the joyful feelings that come with the flow state should help take the
sting out of further practice, setting such people up for future
success, says Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi at Claremont Graduate University
in California. Conversely, his research into the flow state in children
showed that, as he puts it, "young people who didn't enjoy the pursuit
of the subject they were gifted in, whether it was mathematics or music,
stopped developing their skills and reverted to mediocrity."

Despite its potentially crucial role in the development of talent, many
researchers had deemed the flow state too slippery a concept to tackle -
tainted as it was with mystical, meditative connotations. In the late
1970s, Csikszentmihalyi, then a psychologist at the University of
Chicago, helped change that view by showing that the state could be
defined and studied empirically. In one groundbreaking study, he
interviewed a few hundred talented people, including athletes, artists,
chess players, rock climbers and surgeons, enabling him to pin down four
key features that characterise flow.

The first is an intense and focused absorption that makes you lose all
sense of time. The second is what is known as autotelicity, the sense
that the activity you are engaged in is rewarding for its own sake. The
third is finding the "sweet spot", a feeling that your skills are
perfectly matched to the task at hand, leaving you neither frustrated
nor bored. And finally, flow is characterised by automaticity, the sense
that "the piano is playing itself", for example.

Exactly what happens in the brain during flow has been of particular
interest, but it has been tricky to measure. Csikszentmihalyi took an
early stab at it, using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the
brain waves of expert chess players during a game. He found that the
most skilled players showed less activity in the prefrontal cortex,
which is typically associated with higher cognitive processes such as
working memory and verbalisation. That may seem counter-intuitive, but
silencing self-critical thoughts might allow more automatic processes to
take hold, which would in turn produce that effortless feeling of flow.

Later studies have confirmed these findings and revealed other neural
signatures of flow. Chris Berka and her colleagues at Advanced Brain
Monitoring in Carlsbad, California, for example, looked at the brain
waves of Olympic archers and professional golfers. A few seconds before
the archers fired off an arrow or the golfers hit the ball, the team
spotted a small increase in what's known as the alpha band, one of the
frequencies that arises from the electrical noise of all the brain's
neurons (The International Journal of Sport and Society, vol 1, p 87).
This surge in alpha waves, Berka says, is associated with reduced
activation of the cortex, and is always more obvious in experts than in
novices. "We think this represents focused attention on the target,
while other sensory inputs are suppressed," says Berka. She found that
these mental changes are accompanied by slower breathing and a lower
pulse rate - as you might expect from relaxed concentration.

Defining and characterising the flow state is all very well, but could a
novice learn to turn off their critical faculties and focus their
attention in this way, at will? If so, would it boost performance?
Gabriele Wulf, a kinesiologist at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas,
helped to answer this question in 1998, when she and her colleagues
examined the way certain athletes move (Journal of Motor Behavior, vol
30, p 169).

At the time, she had no particular interest in the flow state. But Wulf
and her colleagues found that they could quickly improve a person's
abilities by asking them to focus their attention on an external point
away from their body. Aspiring skiers who were asked to do slalom-type
movements on a simulator, for example, learned faster if they focused on
a marked spot ahead of them. Golfers who focused on the swing of the
club were about 20 per cent more accurate than those who focused on
their own arms.

Wulf and her colleagues later found that an expert's physical actions
require fewer muscle movements than those of a beginner - as seen in the
tight, spare motions of top-flight athletes. They also experience less
mental strain, a lower heart rate and shallower breathing - all
characteristics of the flow state (Human Movement Science, vol 29, p 440).

These findings were borne out in later studies of expert and novice
swimmers. Novices who concentrated on an external focus - the water's
movement around their limbs - showed the same effortless grace as those
with more experience, swimming faster and with a more efficient
technique. Conversely, when the expert swimmers focused on their limbs,
their performance declined (International Journal of Sport Science &
Coaching, vol 6, p 99).

Wulf's findings fit well with the idea that flow - and better learning -
comes when you turn off conscious thought. "When you have an external
focus, you achieve a more automatic type of control," she says. "You
don't think about what you are doing, you just focus on the outcome."

Berka has been taking a different approach to evoke the flow state - her
group is training novice marksmen to use neurofeedback. Each person is
hooked up to electrodes that tease out and display specific brain waves,
along with a monitor that measures their heartbeat. By controlling their
breathing and learning to deliberately manipulate the waveforms on the
screen in front of them, the novices managed to produce the alpha waves
characteristic of the flow state. This, in turn, helped them improve
their accuracy at hitting the targets. In fact, the time it took to
shoot like a pro fell by more than half (The International Journal of
Sport and Society, vol 1, p 87).

But as I found when I tried the method, even neurofeedback has a catch.
It takes time and effort to produce really thrumming alpha waves. Just
when I thought I had achieved them, they evaporated and I lost my
concentration. Might there be a faster way to force my brain into flow?
The good news is that there, too, the answer appears to be yes.

That is why I'm now allowing Michael Weisend, who works at the Mind
Research Network in Albuquerque, New Mexico, to hook my brain up to
what's essentially a 9-volt battery. He sticks the anode - the positive
pole of the battery - to my temple, and the cathode to my left arm.
"You're going to feel a slight tingle," he says, and warns me that if I
remove an electrode and break the connection, the voltage passing
through my brain will blind me for a good few seconds.

Weisend, who is working on a US Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency programme to accelerate learning, has been using this form of
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to cut the time it takes
to train snipers. From the electrodes, a 2-milliamp current will run
through the part of my brain associated with object recognition - an
important skill when visually combing a scene for assailants.

The mild electrical shock is meant to depolarise the neuronal membranes
in the region, making the cells more excitable and responsive to inputs.
Like many other neuroscientists working with tDCS, Weisend thinks this
accelerates formation of new neural pathways during the time that
someone practises a skill. The method he is using on me boosted the
speed with which wannabe snipers could detect a threat by a factor of
2.3 (Experimental Brain Research, vol 213, p 9).

Mysteriously, however, these long-term changes also seem to be preceded
by a feeling that emerges as soon as the current is switched on and is
markedly similar to the flow state. "The number one thing I hear people
say after tDCS is that time passed unduly fast," says Weisend. Their
movements also seem to become more automatic; they report calm, focused
concentration - and their performance improves immediately.

It's not yet clear why some forms of tDCS should bring about the flow
state. After all, if tDCS were solely about writing new memories, it
would be hard to explain the improvement that manifests itself as soon
as the current begins to flow.

One possibility is that the electrodes somehow reduce activity in the
prefrontal cortex - the area used in critical thought, which
Csikszentmihalyi had found to be muted during flow. Roy Hamilton, a
neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, thinks
this may happen as a side effect of some forms of tDCS. "tDCS might have
much more broad effects than we think it does," he says. He points out
that some neurons can mute the signals of other brain cells in their
network, so it is possible that stimulating one area of the brain might
reduce activity in another.
Uncertain effect

Others are more sceptical. Arne Dietrich of the American University of
Beirut, Lebanon, suspects that learning will be impaired if the frontal
cortex isn't initially engaged in the task. What's more, he thinks you
would need a specialised type of tDCS to dampen activity in the
prefrontal cortex. "But then again, it is not clear what sort of ripple
effect tDCS has globally," he concedes, "regardless of which brain area
is targeted."

In any case, it is clear that not all forms of tDCS bring about flow.
Roi Cohen Kadosh at the University of Oxford certainly saw no signs of
it when he placed an anode over the brain regions used in spatial reasoning.

This debate will only be resolved with much more research. For now, I'm
intrigued about what I'll experience as I ask Weisend to turn on the
current. Initially, there is a slight tingle, and suddenly my mouth
tastes like I've just licked the inside of an aluminium can. I don't
notice any other effect. I simply begin to take out attacker after
attacker. As twenty of them run at me brandishing their guns, I calmly
line up my rifle, take a moment to breathe deeply, and pick off the
closest one, before tranquilly assessing my next target.

In what seems like next to no time, I hear a voice call out, "Okay,
that's it." The lights come up in the simulation room and one of the
assistants at Advanced Brain Monitoring, a young woman just out of
university, tentatively enters the darkened room.

In the sudden quiet amid the bodies around me, I was really expecting
more assailants, and I'm a bit disappointed when the team begins to
remove my electrodes. I look up and wonder if someone wound the clocks
forward. Inexplicably, 20 minutes have just passed. "How many did I
get?" I ask the assistant.

She looks at me quizzically. "All of them."

Diy brain enhancement

Zapping your brain with a small current seems to improve everything from
mathematical skills to marksmanship, but for now your best chance of
experiencing this boost is to sign up for a lab experiment. Machines
that provide transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) cost £5000 a
pop, and their makers often sell them only to researchers.

That hasn't stopped a vibrant community of DIY tDCS enthusiasts from
springing up. Their online forums are full of accounts of their
home-made experiments, including hair-curling descriptions of blunders
that, in one case, left someone temporarily blind.

What drives people to take such risks? Roy Hamilton, a neuroscientist at
the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, thinks it is part of a
general trend he calls cosmetic neuroscience, in which people try to
tailor their brains to the demands of an increasingly fast-paced world.
"In a society where both students and their professors take stimulant
medications to meet their academic expectations," he warns, "the
potential pressure for the use of cognitive enhancing technologies of
all types is very real".

Sally Adee is a technology feature editor at New Scientist

-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

Reply via email to