On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Dibyo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26 September 2012 22:51, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There’s no doubt that it’s drop-dead cool, but the pictures are fairly >> limited in terms of traditional photographic values: resolution, >> sensitivity, and so on. Also, you have to use their proprietary >> viewer, which is the big obstacle for me. -T >> > > So, it's not possible to export pics from their software? What's the point, > then?
Of course it is! > My first impression is that this is great for journalists/reporters/bloggers > etc. rather than the traditional photographer who has his multi-thousand > dollar which can do a billion more things anyhow. I would really like to try > this out, given that I have zero photographic skill, and this is just about > the size of camera I can deal with. I noticed that they sell in SG (via some > dealer) - does any SG silklister have one? > > However, I was unable to figure out from the website what the typical > resolution (in layman equivalent terms, not in lightrays) of the pics are - > does anyone know? I think it is great for casual users. Not for professionals. Andre
