On 06-Dec-13 11:39 AM, Udhay Shankar N wrote:

> http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/09/12/tasting-wine-blind/

Another viewpoint, partially inspired by the above piece:

http://www.anxiousmachine.com/blog/2013/12/10/placibo-philes

Placebo-philes
December 10, 2013

Audiophiles have gotten a lot of bad press recently, what with the
apparently silly Pono music player (which plays much higher quality
audio files despite almost no one being able to hear the difference) and
the news from Wired magazine that "burning in" your headphones has no
discernible effect on sound quality. Reading about the truly insane
things audiophiles will do in pursuit of the perfect sound, I can't help
reflecting back on that unfortunate period in my life when I almost fell
down the same rabbit hole.

For me it started with a simple search for better headphones. I think I
typed "best headphones under $50" into Google, and what came back was a
series of lists, like this one or this one, ranking the best headphones
at a series of price ranges. I settled on a pair pretty quickly, and
when they arrived I loved them, but those lists had planted their hooks
in my brain. How much better would my music sound if I were willing to
spend just a little bit more?

I decided to research what headphones I would buy the next time I had
saved up a decent amount of money, and my research led me to my first
(and really only) foray into Internet forums: a website called Head-Fi,
where enthusiasts gather to discuss, argue, and bond over their love of
headphones and headphone-related accessories. It was a remarkably
friendly place for people who enjoyed tuning out the world, but darkness
lurked at the edges. People would post glowing reviews of the headphones
they just bought, and others would weigh in about how much they loved
those headphones too, but inevitably someone would say how those
headphones would sound even better if connected to a decent headphone
amplifier. Or a decent digital audio converter. Or how those headphones
didn't even compare to these other headphones that just cost a little more.

The perfect headphone set up always cost just a little bit more. Audio
nirvana was always just out of reach.

Over the course of three years, I wound up buying one pair of headphones
that cost about $100, then another that cost about $150, then a
headphone amplifier that cost about $100, then another headphone
amplifier that cost several hundred, then a special iPod that had been
rewired for better sound, then several more pairs of headphones, each
more expensive than the last. It helped that the internet made it easy
to resell my previous purchases in order to fund my new purchases. At
the height of my sickness, my portable sound system looked like this:

portable rig

But that was nothing compared to the equipment (and prices paid) by
many. The most money I ever paid for headphones was about $300. But the
best headphones were going for more than $1000, and the best amplifiers
and related devices were many times that. People would post pictures
like this:

high end rig

and I'd wonder what in God's name that would sound like.

I don't think it's an accident that this period in my life was the same
period in which I had two children in diapers and an extremely stressful
job. After putting the kids to bed, if I didn't have any more work to
do, and if my wife wanted to watch TV, I would find a quiet spot in the
house and get lost in the increasingly detailed soundstage my gear supplied.

But the specter that loomed over everything was the idea that this was
all some big placebo effect. I would occasionally spend an evening
listening to a song on my new set of headphones and then on my old set,
or with my new amplifier and then my old amplifier. I would make my wife
listen to see if she heard a difference. Sometimes she did, sometimes
she didn't. Sometimes I didn't. Every once in a while, I'd read a post
on Head-fi about someone who was selling everything he'd bought because
he realized he was listening to his equipment rather than music. I
finally had the same realization and made the same decision. At the
time, I felt like a recovering addict, or a victim of a con artist,
reformed but slightly ashamed.

I got a new percpective on that period, however, when I this recent
piece by Felix Salmon (via Kottke) about converting money into
happiness. Salmon is also interested in placebo effects, specifically in
the world of wine tasting, where experiments have frequently shown that
very few people call tell the difference between cheap and expensive
wine, or even the difference between red and white wine. When I first
read about those studies, they reminded me of the scene in Brideshead
Revisited when a couple guys get drunk and describe the wine they're
tasting with increasingly absurd metaphors:

    "….It is a little shy wine like a gazelle." "Like a leprechaun."
"Dappled in a tapestry window." "and this is a wise old wine." "A
prophet in a cave." "and this is a necklace of pearls on a white neck."
"Like a swan." "Like the last unicorn."

I had moments almost as absurd with my headphones, when I heard things
inside songs I swore I'd never heard before, when I felt as if parts of
the music were two dimensional backdrops and then three dimensional
shapes would leap out of the picture towards me, or the music would
drizzle over my head, or crackle like lightning, or I'd swear I could
smell the studio where the song had been recorded, or something.

In other words, I was an idiot. Because on other nights, usually after
I'd owned that same set of gear for a little while, I wouldn't hear
those things any more, and I'd start thinking that I needed better gear.
I needed a new placebo affect.

It's easy to sneer at the placebo effect, or to feel ashamed of it when
you're its victim. And that's precisely why I found Felix Salmon's piece
revelatory, because instead of sneering at the placebo effect of fancy
wine, its marketing, and its slightly higher prices, he thinks we should
take advantage of it. If the placebo effect makes us happy, why not take
advantage of that happiness?

    The more you spend on a wine, the more you like it. It really
doesn’t matter what the wine is at all. But when you’re primed to taste
a wine which you know a bit about, including the fact that you spent a
significant amount of money on, then you’ll find things in that bottle
which you love ... After all, what you see on the label, including what
you see on the price tag, is important information which can tell you a
lot about what you’re drinking. And the key to any kind of
connoisseurship is informed appreciation of something beautiful.

This idea of "informed appreciation" reminds me of another area of
modern life beset by placebo effects: the world of alternative medicine.
In a recent article for the Atlantic, David H. Freedman argues that
there's virtually no scientific evidence that alternative medicine
(anything from chiropractic care to acupuncture) has any curative
benefit beyond a placebo effect. And so many scientists are outraged
that anyone takes alternative medicine seriously. However, there is one
area where alternative medicine often trumps traditional medicine:
stress reduction. And stress reduction can, of course, make a huge
impact on people's health. The Atlantic article quotes Elizabeth
Blackburn, a biologist at the University of California at San Francisco
and a Nobel laureate.

    “We tend to forget how powerful an organ the brain is in our
biology,” Blackburn told me. “It’s the big controller. We’re seeing that
the brain pokes its nose into a lot of the processes involved in these
chronic diseases. It’s not that you can wish these diseases away, but it
seems we can prevent and slow their onset with stress management.”
Numerous studies have found that stress impairs the immune system, and a
recent study found that relieving stress even seems to be linked to
slowing the progression of cancer in some patients.

Perhaps not surprisingly, a trip to the chiropractor or the
acupuncturist is much more likely to reduce your stress than a trip to
the doctor. If anything, a trip to the doctor makes you more anxious.

Maybe each of these activities (listening to high end audio gear,
drinking high end wine, having needles inserted into your chakras) is
really about ritualizing a sensory experience. By putting on headphones
you know are high quality, or drinking expensive wine, or entering the
chiropractor's office, you are telling yourself, "I am going to focus on
this moment. I am going to savor this." It's the act of savoring, rather
than the savoring tool, that results in both happiness and a longer life.

Of course, you don't need ultra high end gear to enjoy your music, or
ultra high end wine to enjoy your evening, just as you shouldn't solely
use acupuncture to treat your cancer. It might be as effective to learn
how to meditate. But maybe we all just need to meditate in different ways.


Reply via email to