List - I agree with George M to get the tests done anyway. I'll try to come up with another $10 (I know it's not much; I'm sorry). I think having some back-up data is important. Showing the public test results from A SINGLE LAB may not cut it with the opposition. Considering what CS has done for me, with a *serious* illness, our efforts in this matter could really help a lot of people dispell doubts about it's worth. But they'll need more proof than *just* our personal experiences and *probably* more than one test result.
It may also be "progressive" for CS-listers to start including their protocols when reporting on success/failures in using CS so that others can make better judgements with their own protocols. Maybe even the inclusion of things like body weight and nutritional habits (ie: how much coffe does someone drink a day, are "sweets" eaten or alcohol consumed, what vitamins/minerals are also being taken). This may sound complicated at first, but it really isn't, and I think it will shed some light on the process as a whole. There is a rumour that Vitamin-C, for example, may have a "chelating affect" on C-Silver and that it should be taken several hours after C-Silver. This has not been confirmed, but if folks on the list are taking 'X' amount of silver for 'X' disease 'X' times a day and still getting little or no results, it may not be in the PPM or the *way* the CS was made, but in other aspects of their life -- like nutrition. If we establish some solid ground work here, it could branch off into a *real* scientific methodology that even mainstream science cannot ignore, and *maybe* even help people who were previously afraid of CS to approach trying it! Dameon ______________________________ Very sorry folks, I hadn't had my morning coffee yet when I read Joyce's lab report and I was VERY WRONG! It was indeed done at the desired concentrations with precisely the kind of data points I was looking for. Thanks again Joyce. Well, I look to you all for guidance at this point. Should we proceed with our own test at this point(replication is always good science) or should we just call it done and save the money for some other CS related endeavor? Help! Thanks, Doug. ------------------------------ I think that we should proceed with our tests. Can't have too much data! Of course, the lab tests won't tell us anything about how the different particle sizes travel through the body. At best it will give us an indication of what happens when (if) the silver reaches the offending organism. One other item I have been thinking about recently. If the data from Joyce's test holds true for ours then what is the quantity of CS we need to ingest to bring up the level of silver in the blood (or whatever body fluid is the target) to levels that are toxic to the 'bad' virus/bacteria. Seems to me it would be quite a bit... I remember someone posting the doses recommended according to body weight but I don't have access to my archives. Regards, George Martin -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
