Greetings, The UNICEF and one other organization got the boot from the SFM here because the innoculations of one island nearly killed the entire island. THe resultant sickness created by there well meaning injections too27 lives in three weeks. The Island Chiefs decided the help was not need and the workers were escorted to their boats and told not to return. It has taken me nearly two years to get Silver to them and have them trust it enough to try it. This has proven massively effective.
A simular group went in and changed the peoples diet, believing that had a better idea about nutrition. This also took lives as the locals diet had not changed in 100's of years. Good caring people with the wrong over educated idea's supported by megabucks groups......they never intended to kill......but they did. Not one person has been identifed as the responciple party for the cause of the loss of life. Still wonder who decided this type of garbage is OK? Cisco Hermes, Kristofer J wrote: > > On 7 May 1998 at 7:28 PM, Michael C Slivinski wrote: > > Hello All, regarding Cisco work with CS, and little critters going > away... > what a in expensive way to save a village(s). UN should be made aware of > this type of info.... even UNESCO / peace corps / red cross or who ever > whatever, thoughts > > mike slivinski > > On 7 May 1998 at 9:01 PM, bjs1779 wrote: > > The UN don't care. They want to run lives, not save them. > Don't ya know......... > > Well, I suppose if one wanted to take a complex issue and boil it down > to a simplistic level, one could say that "The UN don't care." But, if > you wanted to go a little deeper, you'd find out that the UN is made of > people just like you and I, who care a lot about saving people's lives. > > Over the last decade, I have worked as a volunteer advocate for > eliminating needless death due to hunger and malnutrition, and UNICEF > has been a worthy partner in this effort. This does not mean that I > have not had reservations about the way the UN and UNICEF operate. In > other words, it's their methods that are flawed, not their commitment to > do *good.* > > I have long thought that mass immunization, which UNICEF endorses and > implements worldwide (along with WHO), is the wrong way to fight > disease. However, like it or not, that is the conventional orthodox > method of the day, and until we can change the *paradigm,* that's the > way it's going to stay. I would love to work with anyone interested in > figuring out how to penetrate that *paradigm,* but I'm afraid the forces > are much too strong presently. The collaboration, say between UNICEF > and drug companies (like Merck), is as strong as the amount of money > being made from the distribution of the serum. > > The wall is not impenetrable, merely high...just know that organizations > like UNICEF and the UN are not inherently *bad,* just misguided. > > I am open to any thoughts on this issue... > > Kris > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
