wow you are really getting offensive now- call yourself by a slave name if you want to. My name was given to me with love by my mother. Your words are disrespectful and imply that a person can't be taken seriously unless they are called by a specific type of name, which is at best silly at worst seriously offensive.

You set it up as "them" and "us". You sound like a racist.

Kathryn

On Dec 26, 2007, at 10:53 AM, sol wrote:

Look into the history of how they acquired their names--this is not a silly issue. If they are interbred and americanized to the point where even the leaders of the movement have names like Russell Means and Phyllis Young, and keep them, they are giving up a very important way of re-establishing their indigenous culture. Names are NOT a silly issue. For me to take them seriously, they need to get rid of what are, in effect, "slave names".
sol

Clayton Family wrote:
no.

those are their names. They should use the name they have. Don't be silly.

On Dec 25, 2007, at 7:53 PM, sol wrote:

If they are serious, they should perhaps stop using their "white american" first and last names, and take on Lakota names?
sol



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>