Carol Ann,
No, I just wanted folks to know that my testimonial was not contrived, and
hoped that by stating my profession it would lend some credibility to the
message.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Nave
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention
*I* am better looking than Einstein...
Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carol Ann [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention
Well, I guess, from your perspective, your experience makes you smarter
than Albert Einstein.
bbanever <[email protected]> wrote:
I am a medical professional, having an OMD degree and have been in
practice for over 32 years.
----- Original Message -----
From: Carol Ann
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?
What is proof? Einstein himself declined to answer that question with
specificity. Max Planck, a noted physicist said......
"new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and
making them see the light; but rather, because it opponents eventually die and
a new generation grows up that is familiar with it"........
MMS either works, or it doesn't. If it doesn't the person current state
of health may not require it - presumption is that health is good. This is
what is called clinical observation.
Seems to me we have one of the best clinical observations occurring
right here, and elsewhere, on other MMS forums. Some responses have been
excellent, if not extraordinary when all else has failed, some mediocre, some
subtle and uneventful. No double blind studies, everyone is an equal
opportunity participant.
No profit driven scientific entity is going to do double blind studies
on a .50 cent substance to provide "proof" one way or another.
sol <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, all the remarks made about how great it is sound like
unsubstantiated statements to me.
Viewpoint is everything. I'll check back in on MMS in 5 years or so,
and
see how users are doing.
Until then, it is just chlorine to me, and not anything I want to put
in
my body.
sol
Stephen Rose wrote:
> I'm sorry, this is not a viewpoint. It's just a bunch of
> unsubstantiated statements. I suppose it could be the result of a
> viewpoint. This person has obviously done no research or had any
> personal experience. You should take it for what it's worth.
>