Carol Ann,

     No, I just wanted folks to know that my testimonial was not contrived, and 
hoped that by stating my profession it would lend some credibility to the 
message.

    
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Nave 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:00 AM
  Subject: RE: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention


  *I* am better looking than Einstein...

  Dan



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Carol Ann [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:48 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention


    Well, I guess, from your perspective,  your experience makes you smarter 
than Albert Einstein. 

    bbanever <[email protected]> wrote: 
      I am a medical professional, having an OMD degree and have been in 
practice for over 32 years.  
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Carol Ann 
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:47 PM
        Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?


        What is proof?  Einstein himself declined to answer that question with 
specificity.   Max Planck, a noted physicist said......
        "new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and 
making them see the light; but rather, because it opponents eventually die and 
a new generation grows up that is familiar with it"........

        MMS either works, or it doesn't. If it doesn't the person current state 
of health may not require it - presumption is that health is good.  This is 
what is called clinical observation. 
        Seems to me we have one of the best clinical observations occurring 
right here, and elsewhere, on other MMS forums.  Some responses have been 
excellent, if not extraordinary when all else has failed,  some mediocre, some 
subtle and uneventful.  No double blind studies, everyone is an equal 
opportunity participant. 

        No profit driven scientific entity is going to do double blind studies 
on a .50 cent substance to provide "proof" one way or another.  

        sol <[email protected]> wrote: 
          Well, all the remarks made about how great it is sound like 
          unsubstantiated statements to me.
          Viewpoint is everything. I'll check back in on MMS in 5 years or so, 
and 
          see how users are doing.
          Until then, it is just chlorine to me, and not anything I want to put 
in 
          my body.
          sol

          Stephen Rose wrote:
          > I'm sorry, this is not a viewpoint. It's just a bunch of 
          > unsubstantiated statements. I suppose it could be the result of a 
          > viewpoint. This person has obviously done no research or had any 
          > personal experience. You should take it for what it's worth.
          >