Without a doubt! ----- Original Message ----- From: Carol Ann To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:25 AM Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention
Oh, I forgot to ask....are u better looking than Einstein. :) bbanever <[email protected]> wrote: Carol Ann, No, I just wanted folks to know that my testimonial was not contrived, and hoped that by stating my profession it would lend some credibility to the message. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Nave To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:00 AM Subject: RE: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention *I* am better looking than Einstein... Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Carol Ann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure?/Forgot to mention Well, I guess, from your perspective, your experience makes you smarter than Albert Einstein. bbanever <[email protected]> wrote: I am a medical professional, having an OMD degree and have been in practice for over 32 years. ----- Original Message ----- From: Carol Ann To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:47 PM Subject: Re: CS>MMs hoax or cure? What is proof? Einstein himself declined to answer that question with specificity. Max Planck, a noted physicist said...... "new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light; but rather, because it opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it"........ MMS either works, or it doesn't. If it doesn't the person current state of health may not require it - presumption is that health is good. This is what is called clinical observation. Seems to me we have one of the best clinical observations occurring right here, and elsewhere, on other MMS forums. Some responses have been excellent, if not extraordinary when all else has failed, some mediocre, some subtle and uneventful. No double blind studies, everyone is an equal opportunity participant. No profit driven scientific entity is going to do double blind studies on a .50 cent substance to provide "proof" one way or another. sol <[email protected]> wrote: Well, all the remarks made about how great it is sound like unsubstantiated statements to me. Viewpoint is everything. I'll check back in on MMS in 5 years or so, and see how users are doing. Until then, it is just chlorine to me, and not anything I want to put in my body. sol Stephen Rose wrote: > I'm sorry, this is not a viewpoint. It's just a bunch of > unsubstantiated statements. I suppose it could be the result of a > viewpoint. This person has obviously done no research or had any > personal experience. You should take it for what it's worth. > Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think.. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
