Scott: Yes it is American Biotech. I've been told that it has been approved as non-toxic by the EPA and that the Center for Disease Control may very well be using it. We call it Silver Aquasol technology, however, since I was not at the last convention and haven't listened to the speaker on my dvd yet, I don't know much. Anyway the simplest electronics is way over my head so I need to consult with all you experts out there. Thanks for the feedback.
On Jan 29, 2008 6:43 AM, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > So is mixing the 1-3% H2O2 the difference to be able to patent it? Or, is > this the company that was featured on prime time TV as having a contract > with the US govt to provide their products to various govt agencies to help > fight MRSA in such agencies? Anyhow, I do not believe that their products > are any better than the ones we make. So, it appears somebody is scratching > backs here. Is this another poor choice of spending taxpayer monies? We > shall see. I believe the company that the broadcast was about is named, > American Biotech Labs, and their website is: > http://www.americanbiotechlabs.com. I apologize if this is not the right > company but I am pretty sure it is. Anywho, have a great day and don't > forget that gulp or two of CS today! > > > *faith gagne <[email protected]>* wrote: > > They probably do not look at previous submissions when there are legal > fees > to be harvested. Faith G. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marshall Dudley" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:08 AM > Subject: Re: CS>PPM question > > > > He has taken what has been discussed here for years, and applied for a > > patent. No way it could ever stand up in court, nothing new, everything > > he has in it was common public knowledge. Plus the method of making it > is > > almost identical to the patent I filed for in 1999, which was thrown out > > > as being nothing new, simply repeating the art. Weird how they can throw > > > out an application as not new, then take one very similar and process > it. > > Don't they even look at the previous submissions? > > > > Marshall > > > > Sharlene Miyamura wrote: > >> This is the product's patent. > >> > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,135,195.PN.&OS=PN/7,135,195&RS=PN/7,135,195 > >> > >> I hope someone can scan it and tell me if it is different from EIS. > >> > >> > >> On Jan 28, 2008 7:26 AM, Clayton Family > >> > wrote: > >> > >> I don't know about that, but I do know that I made and used about > >> 5 PPM > >> for the first year or so that I used cs, and it worked great. I > >> believe it is not the actual ppm, but the amount of silver total- > >> so if > >> it is 5ppm, you just use more of it, more often. Perhaps the product > >> is different? > >> > >> kathryn > >> > >> On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Sharlene Miyamura wrote: > >> > >> > Would the level of ppm have any bearing on it's effectivenss on > >> > whether it is a virus or bacteria? > >> > I've heard another forum that the higher the ppm is, the less > >> > effective it is on a virus but more effective on bacteria. > >> > Is there any truth to this? So some are preferring to go with the > >> > 10-14 ppm rather than the 18 ppm. > >> > > Thank you for any information you can provide. > >> > >> -- > >> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >> > >> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: > >> http://silverlist.org > >> > >> To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... > >> > >> List maintainer: Mike Devour > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Scotty (Beam Me Up!) > > ------------------------------ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> > >
