Gene writes,
"Of course there is no clinical data, what Big Pharma company would
spend the money to do clinical studies when they could not patent the
product and make money off of it? This says nothing about the
effectiveness of CS. No one on this list wants to spend the money to
collect clinical data, so there is no data."

There is simply no mechanism to support the expense of a thorough
investigation into the effectiveness or lack thereof as a method of
dealing with various bacteria, viruses or fungi. It is extremely easy
for anyone to make colloidal silver, which is eighty percent Ionic and
fifteen to twenty percent particulate. It is also a fact that it does
not lend itself to shipment and storage after being made. The particles
are held in suspension by Brownian motion and the Ionic portion exists
in solution due to a mutually repulsive electrical charge of individual
atoms. Vibration or external stimulus including photons tends to cause
these particles to agglomerate and fall out of solution. All that being
said, it is still a very useful product. We will probably never know
precisely why it works as it does as there is simply no money in it. 
And
money, after all, is what makes the world go round. 

"And what would anyone expect from a mainline medical establishment?"

If you are ever so unfortunate as to have a serious illness that chug-a
lugging CS doesn't fix, you might be grateful they exist.

"The FDA is a branch of Big Pharma"

If this were true I doubt that our toddlers would now be chewing on 
lead painted toys from China.

"The information from this list is much more valuable."

We can certainly agree on that.  One of the most useful functions of the list 
is the de-bunking of items such as 
"Molecula Silver", that is supposed to be smaller than a single atom, LOL.



Best Regards,
Arnold Beland
www.atlasnova.com

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gene Wolfe 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 5:56 PM
  Subject: Re: CS>Molecula Silver .. comments please


  And what would anyone expect from a mainline medical establishment? The key 
to this statement is: "Although no human clinical data support the use of oral
  colloidal silver, it is being promoted as a cure for AIDS, cancer, and
  diabetes." 
  Of course there is no clinical data, what Big Pharma company would spend the 
money to do clinical studies when they could not patent the product and make 
money off of it? This says nothing about the effectiveness of CS. No one on 
this list wants to spend the money to collect clinical data, so there is no 
data. 

  The FDA is a branch of Big Pharma, so they are not going to say anything good 
about CS. And the examples tell nothing about what the CS product was that they 
site. 

  The information from this list is much more valuable.

  Gene


  At 06:13 PM 5/18/2008, you wrote:

    The link you sent said not found.  This is what I found at Sloan-Kettering 

    (  http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/69189.cfm ) , not exactly what I wanted 
to hear.  

                                                                                
                         Pat