A dead virus should be nothing more than a chemical structure.
In some cases a dead virus may be sufficient to trigger an immune system
response that's sufficient to trigger antibody production without going
into inflammation.
What sort of response depends on what the body needs to do to produce a
given antibody to a particular class of virus.
Every virus is different and the immune system is picky, that's what
makes them so hard to defeat.
An effective vaccine has to trigger the immune system into producing
antibodies one way or another.
Usually a weakened or similar but *relatively* harmless live virus is
used to do that job.
If a dead one will do it, a dead one is used.
A multi purpose vaccine may have a mix of several live and dead strains.
Part of that immune system response can be inflammation.
If the genetics are susceptible to inflammation and the body requires
inflammation to get the job done, the immune system triggered can be a big
problem, no matter what triggers it.
It's possible that genetic screening can help prevent vaccine damage,
[Genetic screening is a very new field of endeavor] however...even though
the odds of catching a destructive virus may be reduced with care and the
default of everyone else being vaccinated, catching that virus will always
be a possibility, with the same, or worse, consequences.
Worse, because the disease being prevented by a moderate invasion from a
vaccine will likely inflame far more and have other destructive
possibilities than the weakened or "relatively" harmless similar virus has.
Some of those suckers can permanently damage the heart valves, ear drums,
optic nerves and other delicate things.
Generally speaking, it's not the virus that kills people, it's an over
response to it that does.
For instance: The immune system response to H5N1 bird flu is nearly 100%
deadly if steps aren't taken to prevent the body from drowning in its own
defenses...the virus itself, isn't and does very little actual damage
In effect, the body thinks it needs a battle axe to kill a mosquito and
that over reaction is part of the common genetic pool.
With Autism, there's an uncommon genetic pool at work doing something
similar.
If genetic screening comes into play, such things could be bred out of the
population by selective reproductive sterilization..but that's playing
God..isn't it?
Everyone has a God given right to screw up everyones genes even when they
know they might very likely do so. [wink]
PS Some people never get a cavity and that is a genetic trait as well.
[The fat balding people in my family have perfect teeth while the hairy
skinny ones are a dentists new Porshe ]
Shoot, can't freekin win...but at least I can eat all the tooth rot I
want and not get big as a house while they can eat all the sweet house
building bricks they want and not rot teeth.
Actually, none of us had sweets when we were kids...didn't matter.
Ode
At 12:47 PM 6/12/2008 -0500, you wrote:
Yes. I have read those recent studies too, that are showing it is not the
mercury. Not that mercury is a good idea to use either, but I did not see
the one about the inflammation. So if it is inflammation, why does a
killed viurs vaccine not cause the same problems? My son had a severe
reaction to the pertussis vac, and it was a live virus vac. The killed vac
did not cause that reaction, and the medical studies backed that statement
up. oh well...
kathryn
On Jun 11, 2008, at 8:01 AM, Ode Coyote wrote:
As with eliminating mercury from Vaccines after proving that it's not the
"mercury" that causes Autism, a change does not have to be based on fact
to develop public pressure that the FDA knuckles under to.
Ie: Changing a policy, does not prove that anyone was lying.
It means that the FDA sees itself [true or not] to be a public servant,
subject to the public will...valid, or not...and will knuckle under to
public pressure when an alternative is adequately functional.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1500 - Release Date: 6/12/2008
4:58 PM
