This is a very mixed up and confusing message. Who is saying what? Faith G.
----- Original Message ----- From: Pat To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 11:33 PM Subject: Re: CS>Fonts and Bogus Software I sure hate to comment on computer problems here since I'd rather keep this list about CS and other helpful natural substances, but I just have to mention that Wayne seems to be having the same problem I have when using Eudora. Once I quote something, my font changes to whatever font is in the quote. I haven't found a way to change it back. Here on Yahoo mail I can just change it easily (if I'm using rich text rather than plain text). Evening Jim, >> At 12:43 PM 7/4/2008, you wrote: Dear Wayne: >> As I have said, no ppm meter exists in the world today. Just because many people use the EC meter and call the results ppm metes does not a ppm meter exist. Actually there are at least two scientific instruments that directly measure silver concentration. One is a probe similar to a pH probe that specifically measures silver concentration. The other is a photo spectrometer. Neither one is cheap. I have been to Frank Key’s lab several times and the device he uses burns the silver sample in a plasma then measures the frequency spectrum emitted and the magnatude in relation to a certified standard. Interesting indeed. I made the statement that some high priced instruments exist that will measure a single salt. Possibly these fancy devices would be covered by that. I am not the only person that says this about ppm meters, many others have said the same thing. It just so happens that the collidal silver made by my generator shows that uS is a 1 to 1 realation to PPM using the Hanna PWT tester. Other EC meters probably will be different. See the test report at How did you manage that ? Looks like that would depend on the water as much as the CS. http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator . Maybe I should have said, no Standard ppm meter or...... No off the shelf ppm meter, that one could afford and use exists. The EC meters that are showing ppm have internal calculations much like the people on the list are using. Back to your original statement, >> Actually there are at least two scientific instruments that directly measure silver concentration. I am fully aware that any machine, device or instrument can be designed and built to accomplish virtually any purpose or virtually any task. And, ........ I have no doubt that every think you say is 100 % correct. My only slight difference and problem is that one would consider these highly sophisticated instruments, costing many thousands of dollars to be a ppm meter. They appear to be a single purpose instrument. I don't think you even said that they were ppm meters. <grin> It disturbs me that the instrument industry is talking about combining EC and ppm and having only one unit. Not sure what they could call it. I believe that many would never accept it. ppm is an absolute. EC is also, but they are not the same thing, and never will be. In rare cases, pure water and one item, and they will be close, as you stated. Wayne ========================================
