But without going into the long rigmarole that you are fond of Wayne,
<vbg> it is much simpler to say that while some nutrients or whatever,
are essential for most, they are not for *some*! Never mind the
reasons, it is still a fact that some healthy things do not agree with
some people. To me that is self explanatory without going into the
myriad of reasons *why* this is so, or where the blame lies, if indeed,
one could label such a phenomena, as blame. It is also a fact that some
so-called 'health' things are not healthy i.e. soy. Apparently this is
because it has the wrong sort of 'chain' for want of a better word, that
the human body can utilize. Not the fermented or sprouted sort I hasten
to add, which is perfectly fine. Now, I'm not talking about you Wayne,
but just ordinary mortals! Take me for instance, I cannot eat anything
fibrous as it causes a traffic jam for days, and much discomfort, and
yet we are continuously exhorted to eat fibre to be healthy. As I said,
horses for courses. dee
Wayne Fugitt wrote:
Morning Dee,
>> At 05:59 AM 10/6/2008, you wrote:
The difference in "Who to Blame" and "Who is responsible" is very
important in all phases of life, even in politics.
This is so true sol, because even nutrients which are supposed to
help, can, in some people, be very bad.
Careful now, you are blaming the chicken for the egg. Lots of
things are responsible.
Tell me a single nutrient that is BAD ? I have eaten soy for many
years, never had a single problem, Raw eggs too, and a gallon of milk
a day at times.
A whole pecan pie, and wild cherries that some say are poison !
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
