Hi Tony,
I don't think of argyria as a disease and certainly did not intend to give the
impression that it is. However, as a user of CS I am don't want to get it and I
am concerned that argyria is, I believe, more prevalent than is implied by the
sites listing the reported cases. I am just thinking that there may be a way of
indicating mild instances of argyria and not just the major instances.
I think Mike has a better approach that can also provide insight into the cause
of the argyria.
I agree that argyria is generally harmless excepy possibly when it causes
coloring of the lens of the eye. Given my current sight loss, I would consider
any additional loss as serious.
I appologize if my post offended you.
Regards,
Steve N
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Moody <a...@new.co.za>
To: silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue Jul 14 01:40:36 2009
Subject: Re: CS>How to tell Stage I argyria from Stage III argyria
Hi Steve,
You make it seem that Argyria is a disease.
Do you think that argyria is a disease? To my mind it is merely a
colouration and is perhaps an indicator of something. But I know of no
detriment other that the colour. What are the downsides of having
argyria?
OK,
Tony
