> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:16:02 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: YOUR HELP NEEDED TO DEFEAT DANGEROUS FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION
> 
> 
> YOUR HELP NEED TO DEFEAT DANGEROUS FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION
> 
> AUGUST IS THE MONTH TO VISIT YOUR SENATOR
> 
> Dear Members, 
> 
> As you know, we have been following proposed food safety legislation as it 
> moves through the House and Senate. 
> 
> Last week, the House of Representatives passed HR 2749, the Food Safety 
> Modernization Act, and the next step in the process will be the Senate. 
> Although it is not certain, the Senate will probably focus its food safety 
> discussions on S. 510, sponsored by Senator Durbin of Illinois. S. 510 is 
> different from HR 2749, but it contains many of the same problems (more 
> below). If Congress passes a food safety bill in the form of the House or 
> Senate version, it will be difficult, even impossible, for small food 
> manufacturers and small farms to stay in business-such as the farmer you get 
> your fresh food from and the majority of products listed in our shopping 
> guide.
> 
> NOW IS THE TIME TO VISIT YOUR SENATOR!
> Congress is back home for the month of August, so this is a great time to set 
> up an in-person meeting to discuss the food safety bills. Meeting with your 
> legislators is one of the most effective things you can do to make your voice 
> heard! 
> 
> We have over 10,000 members in the U.S. and there are just 100 Senators. So 
> it is possible to set up at least one meeting with every Senator-hopefully 
> thousands of you will visit your Senators. 
> 
> We know that many of our members have never met with their Congressman or 
> even thought about doing so. The prospect can be intimidating or stressful. 
> Yet there's no reason it should be. They represent you - it's their job. 
> Meeting with your legislators puts a face to an issue, making it very real 
> and tangible for them. It also shows them how important the issue is to you.
> 
> If you call and are told that their schedules are already too full to allow a 
> personal meeting or a meeting with an aide, then go to one of the public 
> events that your Senators will be attending! Ask their local office for the 
> schedule of events that they will be attending in August and speak with them 
> at those events. That allows you to educate members of the public at the same 
> time that you educate your legislators.
> 
> Below are some tips to help with the meetings. And at the end of the alert 
> are some talking points on S. 510 and the food safety bills in general.
> 
> If you do set up a meeting, please send us an email at [email protected] 
> with the title "Food Safety Legislation Activism" so that we can keep track 
> of our progress.
> 
> TIPS ON MEETINGS:
> 
> Before the meeting:
> 
> 1. Find out who your Senators are. You can look this up at www.senate.gov or 
> call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121. (To find out who your 
> Representatives are, go to www.congress.org) 
> 
> 2. Contact their local offices. Introduce yourself, stressing the fact that 
> you're a constituent. Tell them you'd like to set up a meeting with the 
> Senator during the August recess to discuss the food safety bills. You will 
> most likely get transferred to a scheduler and perhaps be asked to put your 
> request in writing.
> 
> 3. If you are unable to meet with the Senator, be willing to accept a meeting 
> with the staffer. Staffers often have a lot of input on issues!
> 
> 4. Plan who will come to the meeting. Keep the group small, no more than 3 or 
> 4 people.
> 
> 5. Plan which points each of you will cover to use your time most 
> effectively. We can help provide you with materials. Email 
> [email protected] or call the office at (703) 208-FARM (3276).
> 
> 6. Dress in business attire and arrive early.
> 
> During the meeting:
> 
> 1. Introduce yourself and remind the Senator or staffer that you are 
> constituents. 
> 
> 2. Be succinct and clear about what you want: food safety bills that do not 
> harm the local food system. Try to emphasize positive items, such as the 
> inspection of imports or the regulation of the huge industrial food 
> processors, which would actually improve food safety.
> 
> 3. While you're discussing the importance of local food systems, take a 
> moment to also discuss the National Animal Identification System and the 
> problems it poses. Encourage them to eliminate funding for the program when 
> the conference committee meets after the August recess.
> 
> 4. Be prepared to educate him or her about the issues. Don't be afraid to say 
> "I don't know" and offer to follow up with more information after the meeting.
> 
> 5. Get the staffer's business card so that you can contact the person again 
> directly.
> 
> After the meeting, write a thank you note. Email or fax is fine. And then 
> send us your impressions of the meeting so that we know where your Senators 
> stand and can follow-up as well. 
> 
> TALKING POINTS (note: these same problems are also found in HR 2749)
> 
> - S.510 calls for federal regulation of how farmers grow and harvest product. 
> Farmers selling food directly to local markets are inherently transparent and 
> accountable to their customers, and there is no reason to impose these 
> regulations on them. Based on FDA's track record, it is likely that such 
> rules will also discriminate against diversified sustainable farms that 
> produce animals and crops in complementary systems. 
> 
> - S.510 expands FDA's powers over food processors, regardless of their size, 
> scale, or distribution. FDA oversight of small, local food processors is 
> overreaching and unnecessary. Small processors selling into local markets do 
> not need federal oversight, unlike the large, industrial, multi-sourced 
> supply chains that are the cause of most foodborne illnesses and food 
> recalls. 
> 
> - S.510 applies a complex Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) 
> system to even the smallest local processors, imposing onerous paperwork and 
> record-keeping on these small businesses. Applying a HACCP system to local 
> foods facilities processing for local markets, as well as farmers making 
> value-added products, could undermine and extinguish these emerging small 
> businesses attempting to bring healthy local foods to American consumers. In 
> fact, when HAACP was applied to the meat packing industry, it was 
> instrumental in reducing the number of smaller regional and local meat 
> packers, yet failed to increase the number of independent, objective 
> inspectors in giant meat slaughtering and packing facilities. For comments on 
> HAACP by a small cheesemaker, see 
> http://hartkeisonline.com/2009/07/24/small-farmer-warns-hr2749-will-put-me-out-of-business/.
> 
> - Bottom line: One size does not fit all when considering food safety bills! 
> Local foods businesses are not the same as animal factories or mega-farms 
> that sell products into industrial scale national and international markets, 
> and should not be regulated the same way!
> 
> 
> Our postal address is 
> PMB #106-380
> 4200 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
> Washington, District of Columbia 20016
> United States
> 

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009