Continued to ensure all goes thru...
Part 2.
Footnote: Until I can find a laboratory which understands testing procedures
for EIS/CS where I am located I must go with the results I have on several
samples I've had analysed...using AAS and acidified HNO3, whatever that may be?
I would also like to say that I use my own equipment and production practices
and praps I simply have more control over what it is I produce. Although the
lab I had my samples tested at may not be connected with human biology or
whatever, the methods for analysis I assume is adequate, could be wrong there
but must go with the results I have til I can find another suitable lab, and
the sponduliks for payment of analysis, and make a comparison. Unfortunately I
can't use the same solution as it's long been consumed. The crux of my
statements lie in those lab results, and I've no reasonable reason to doubt
them.
I've always maintained that as each person uses different equipment for EIS/CS
production, and incorporate their own production practices there must be a
possibility for resultant solutions/suspensions to be different from others,
and may not fall within the accepted norms of published material available in
the public domain.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but most importantly I'd like to know WHY some
of my ion/particle ratios appear to be FAR different from that published
material, remembering that the solution was clear with no settlement observable
over time. It so happens that I have a result for a yellow batch also which
resulted in similar ratios. However, I do have other results which come closer
to your stated ratios, I must have parted my hair differently on the day I made
those batches <g>.
N.
_________________________________________________________________
Looking for a great date? Meet singles at ninemsn dating
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/
