I agree with Ode's general line here that we don't KNOW what would have 
happened had we NOT taken CS.

On the other hand..... when a large group of people, such as the people on this 
list, consistently take CS and have nothing else fully in common in their lives 
and none of them get sick for years...... this is pretty compelling evidence 
that goes beyond the typical assumptions made from anecdotal one-time 
non-reproduceable results.

It's not proof, but.... DAMN!

--- On Fri, 1/1/10, Ode Coyote <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Ode Coyote <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CS>..How many watched the video and passed on..these  videos are 
about Autism
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, January 1, 2010, 9:27 AM


> No..actually it was a conclusion jumped to without considering threshold 
> level factors and the broader picture of sources.

 The vaccine may have crossed an existing threshold for you, but by your own 
testimony, wasn't the major source of mercury.
The chelation and amalgam removal may have brought you just below MS effect 
threshold.
 You see... 10 Tuna fish sandwiches may have done the same thing as the vaccine.
 But you did get the vaccine and didn't eat the sandwiches...so how do you know?

 You don't know.

I've been using CS for ten years and haven't gotten sick, therefore "CS 
prevents illness".
 However, HAVING used the CS, you DON'T know what would have happened had you 
not...and you just can't do both at once to find out.

So, at best, we can draw a general conclusion about ideas.
It's a good idea to use CS....even if it doesn't work, it does no harm and it 
just might work, but there's no way to know on a personal basis and illness is 
nothing BUT personal.
It's a good idea to avoid ALL sources of mercury as best you can.

Ode