16 mhz would be beyond the range of hearing.
Perhaps you mean 16 Hz or 16 KHZ?
One is at the lowest audible and the other near the highest.
Chuck
5 out of 4 people have a problem with fractions.
On 1/9/2010 8:48:57 PM, Steve G ([email protected]) wrote:
> I would go trial and error. And as an experienced wind musician, the shape
> of the instrument would make a difference, but mostly in characteristics
> of the sound that are not relevant to
> it's medical effectiveness. The important thing is achieve 16 mhz, which is
> extremely slow. Middle C, in comparison, is set to a standard of 261.6 mhz.
> The Lung Flute would be tuned to a sub-contra low C.... 4 octaves below
> middle C on the piano, or 1 octave below the lowest C note the piano has.
> (16.35 mhz).
>
> I would expect that not only the length is important, but the thickness of
> the 'reed.
> ' Also, I noticed that at the very top of the lung flute, the tape starts
> off rather stiffly at about a 60 degree angle from the mouthpiece. I'm
> sure this is important to
> it's ability to hit the proper note, but I believe that the most important
> thing is to hit the right vibrational frequency, without regard to the other
> sound characteristics.
>
> It would take some experimentation, especially since I suspect my old ears
> are not capable of detecting such a low note.
>
> Steve G.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/9/10, Dan Nave <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Dan Nave <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: CS>Unidentified subjec
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
