16 mhz would be beyond the range of hearing. Perhaps you mean 16 Hz or 16 KHZ? One is at the lowest audible and the other near the highest.
Chuck 5 out of 4 people have a problem with fractions. On 1/9/2010 8:48:57 PM, Steve G (chube...@yahoo.com) wrote: > I would go trial and error. And as an experienced wind musician, the shape > of the instrument would make a difference, but mostly in characteristics > of the sound that are not relevant to > it's medical effectiveness. The important thing is achieve 16 mhz, which is > extremely slow. Middle C, in comparison, is set to a standard of 261.6 mhz. > The Lung Flute would be tuned to a sub-contra low C.... 4 octaves below > middle C on the piano, or 1 octave below the lowest C note the piano has. > (16.35 mhz). > > I would expect that not only the length is important, but the thickness of > the 'reed. > ' Also, I noticed that at the very top of the lung flute, the tape starts > off rather stiffly at about a 60 degree angle from the mouthpiece. I'm > sure this is important to > it's ability to hit the proper note, but I believe that the most important > thing is to hit the right vibrational frequency, without regard to the other > sound characteristics. > > It would take some experimentation, especially since I suspect my old ears > are not capable of detecting such a low note. > > Steve G. > > > > > > --- On Sat, 1/9/10, Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: CS>Unidentified subjec -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>