I was skirting this because it is a secondary issue. Silver ions are very 
active and will form compounds with the first substance it can. Silver ions do 
not survive the digestive system as free ions. They probably react with stomach 
acid to primarily form silver chloride. The silver may also react with other 
substances such as ammopnia to form other compounds. But they do not remain as 
silver ions. 
- Steve N

________________________________

From: poast <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
Sent: Fri Feb 05 16:03:24 2010
Subject: Re: CS> 


Hello Steve,
 
OK, I am beginning to understand.
 
I have looked at the Altman paper, but have not studied it.  I will take 
another look at it, in detail.
 
If I may present a somewhat weak argument...
 
Doesn't it stand to reason that if you take more, you will not only ingest more 
ions, but also more particles.  Perhaps the elimination through the kidney is 
just because there is more of both in the body...
 
Back to the books, for now.
 
Thanks.
 
Tom
 

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Norton, Steve <mailto:[email protected]>  
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 10:43 AM
        Subject: CS>


        Tom,
        
        I am not suggesting daily use over use as needed. There was a time when 
I first used EIS I used it several times a day. It allowed me to get off a long 
term dependence on antibiotics. Now I take it when I think I need it.
        
        As to why I think that large doses of EIS do not significantly increase 
the effectiveness of EIS is a little more complex and somewhat controversial. 
It has to do with how EIS is processed in the body. The best clue to that comes 
from the Altman Silver Excretion Study. You can find the study at the Silver 
Medicine web site. Unfortunately the study pnly provides clues but not 
definitive answers. That is where the interpretation I mentioned in may 
previous post is important.
        
        IMO the important issue is whether the silver eliminated by the kidney 
is is in solution or particulate form. Silver in solution is far more active 
than silver in particulate form. There are varying opinions on that question. 
One of the more popular theories is that it is a soluble silver/ammonia 
compound is formed and since it contains ammonia it is removed by the kidney. 
However I have found that one of the most likely ammonia compounds, Ag(NH3)2, 
is eliminated by the liver and not the kidney. While I cannot say it with 
absolute certainly, my research indicates that all silver compounds in solution 
are removed by the liver.
        
        For various reasons it appaers that taking large ammounts of EIS 
predominately increases the amount of silver that excretes through the kidney 
which is therefore the much less effective particulate form. So I suggested two 
complementary methods that will increase the silver that is in solution while 
reducing the amount in particulate form. One is holding additional EIS in the 
mouth to allow transport of silver ions through the mucosal tissues without 
swallowing. The other is contained in the note regarding the use of Gatortade.
        I hope this helps.
        
         - Steve
        
        
        
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: poast <[email protected]>
        To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Sent: Fri Feb 05 11:03:13 2010
        Subject: Re: CS>moon on fingernails? -- how much do you use?
        
        Hello Steve,
        
        I am totally new to EIS, so please be gentle with me...
        
        Your opinion seems to be that the best use EIS is to maintain a level 
in the
        body through daily use.  You also indicate that you don't think that a 
large
        dose of EIS is effective.
        
        As I ponder this I find myself finding it difficult to understand.  It 
would
        seem that if your body was "invaded" by a bunch of "bad guys" they would
        overwhelm the "good guys" in your body, and an influx of a large "good 
guy"
        army would help win the war.
        
        I know this is over simplified, but isn't the idea to expose the "bad 
guys"
        to a concentration of the EIS?
        
        I am probably missing a lot, but any "big picture" concepts would be 
greatly
        appreciated.
        
        Tom