I keep hearing that:  once silver ions hit the salty stomach or blood, they 
become silver chloride...

But, something was already x-chloride in both stomach and blood -- sodium 
chloride?

So what does silver do?  Push the sodium aside and take over the chloride ions? 
 How does it do that?  And what happens to the sodium ions?  Or does an excess 
of positive ions of whatever kind go unmatched with the lesser number of 
negative ones?

Help!

Dick




________________________________
From: "Norton, Steve" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 5:59:46 PM
Subject: Re: CS>moon on fingernails? -- how much do you use?

  
I was skirting this because it is a secondary issue. Silver ions are very 
active and will form compounds with the first substance it can. Silver ions do 
not survive the digestive system as free ions. They probably react with stomach 
acid to primarily form silver chloride. The silver may also react with other 
substances such as ammopnia to form other compounds. But they do not remain as 
silver ions. 
- Steve N


________________________________
 From: poast <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
Sent: Fri Feb 05 16:03:24 2010
Subject: Re: CS> 


Hello Steve,
 
OK, I am beginning to understand.
 
I have looked at the Altman paper, but have not 
studied it.  I will take another look at it, in detail.
 
If I may present a somewhat weak 
argument...
 
Doesn't it stand to reason that if you take more, 
you will not only ingest more ions, but also more particles.  Perhaps the 
elimination through the kidney is just because there is more of both in the 
body...
 
Back to the books, for now.
 
Thanks.
 
Tom
 
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Norton, 
>  Steve 
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 10:43 
>  AM
>Subject: CS>
>
>
>Tom,
>
>I am not suggesting daily use over use as needed. 
>  There was a time when I first used EIS I used it several times a day. It 
>  allowed me to get off a long term dependence on antibiotics. Now I take it 
>  when I think I need it.
>
>As to why I think that large doses of EIS do 
>  not significantly increase the effectiveness of EIS is a little more complex 
>  and somewhat controversial. It has to do with how EIS is processed in the 
>  body. The best clue to that comes from the Altman Silver Excretion Study. 
> You 
>  can find the study at the Silver Medicine web site. Unfortunately the study 
>  pnly provides clues but not definitive answers. That is where the 
>  interpretation I mentioned in may previous post is important.
>
>IMO the 
>  important issue is whether the silver eliminated by the kidney is is in 
>  solution or particulate form. Silver in solution is far more active than 
>  silver in particulate form. There are varying opinions on that question. One 
>  of the more popular theories is that it is a soluble silver/ammonia compound 
>  is formed and since it contains ammonia it is removed by the kidney. However 
> I 
>  have found that one of the most likely ammonia compounds, Ag(NH3)2, is 
>  eliminated by the liver and not the kidney. While I cannot say it with 
>  absolute certainly, my research indicates that all silver compounds in 
>  solution are removed by the liver.
>
>For various reasons it appaers that 
>  taking large ammounts of EIS predominately increases the amount of silver 
> that 
>  excretes through the kidney which is therefore the much less effective 
>  particulate form. So I suggested two complementary methods that will 
> increase 
>  the silver that is in solution while reducing the amount in particulate 
> form. 
>  One is holding additional EIS in the mouth to allow transport of silver ions 
>  through the mucosal tissues without swallowing. The other is contained in 
> the 
>  note regarding the use of Gatortade.
>I hope this helps.
>
> - 
>  Steve
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: poast 
>  <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>  <[email protected]>
>Sent: Fri Feb 05 11:03:13 2010
>Subject: 
>  Re: CS>moon on fingernails? -- how much do you use?
>
>Hello 
>  Steve,
>
>I am totally new to EIS, so please be gentle with 
>  me...
>
>Your opinion seems to be that the best use EIS is to maintain a 
>  level in the
>body through daily use.  You also indicate that you don't 
>  think that a large
>dose of EIS is effective.
>
>As I ponder this I find 
>  myself finding it difficult to understand.  It would
>seem that if your 
>  body was "invaded" by a bunch of "bad guys" they would
>overwhelm the "good 
>  guys" in your body, and an influx of a large "good guy"
>army would help win 
>  the war.
>
>I know this is over simplified, but isn't the idea to expose 
>  the "bad guys"
>to a concentration of the EIS?
>
>I am probably missing 
>  a lot, but any "big picture" concepts would be 
>  greatly
>appreciated.
>
>Tom
>
>