You are getting into Zacharia Stitchin territory. He might be right or half right or wrong. Maybe David Icke territory too......... But it's all interesting and not suitable for a colloidal silver list.
G On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Ode Coyote <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Most of our crops were not naturally selected by nature. > They were at least hybridized over centuries of trial and error if not > genetically modified by gene splicing 10s of thousands of years ago. > To date, no one has been able to de-hydridize corn back into it's supposed > inedible wild form. [Why would anyone bother to hybridize something that's > inedible for generation after generation?] > No corn culture refers to any memory of such a grand project and > accomplishment, every one of them says that corn was "given" to them. > Even more wild, according to Loyd Pie, a DNA mitochondria tracing project > revealed that virtually none of our domestic animals and crops have a > genetically direct wild ancestor and the diverse tracks take a jump at a > common time period. > > That's a pretty crazy claim and I'll have to look up the reference to that > study, but the guy does document where he gets his stuff and it's not from > crazy totally unfounded belief town. > The idea here is that maybe we just-don't-know where domestic plants and > animals came from, one or two could be called a fluke..but hundreds? > Gene splicing would answer a whole lot of Occums Razor type mysteries. > If true, that also says we don't know *what* genes were spliced in. > Could it be that the "Heritage/ Heirloom" seed is one at the beginning of > the line of hybrids? The ORIGINAL ? > But that says that those tomatoes were once wild, as is...but, they don't > tend to "volunteer" past one season without cultivation. > You NEVER see a field of wild tomatoes "Heritage", or otherwise. > I have seen many wild chickens running around in Hawaii, but they have no > natural predators there for those easy pickins chickens...other than a few > mongoose which aren't there naturally. > Have you seen wild chickens anywhere else that lived long enough to > actually raise young...even with todays artificial lack of predators? > The razorback boar is an interesting beastie....it changes with environment > without reproducing. Does that mean it's a domesticated wild animal, or just > very adaptable? > Take a look at the Cheetah, a HUGE genetic anomaly. [Somebody wanted both a > cat and a dog but couldn't have but one pet in the apartment...and every one > of them is genetically identical except for a sex chromosome...a clone.] > > Now think on this: Pigs are so genetically close to humans that we can use > pig parts in organ transplants and we share many of the same diseases and > limits in the natural environment. > It is a common myth that animals do not as a rule have sex for pleasure, or > alternatively that humans, pigs and one or two species of primate are the > only species which do. > Could it be that WE are part pig? [We've "bought" part monkey... ] > Many cultures forbid eating pigs...too close to cannibalism? > That's what cannibals say we taste like. > I've seen a few on two feet at Walmart, ey? > Then, of course, there's all those "WASP"s in New York. > > Just because Monsanto is a baby at this, doesn't mean they are the first to > do it or that mistakes weren't made way back in time forgotten that humans > adapted to with the hybridization of survivors. > Yet now..corn and wheat allergies are on the rise as more humans > artificially survive other rigors...de-hybridizing with *random* > cultivation? > ..getting fatter and fatter. > > We just don't know where we came from and tend to ignore the clues, with > what as an excuse? > GOD created us? [And people believe He lives in the sky] > OK, just who and what IS that "being" referred to in the plural in our own > books of records? > ..turned loose from the Eden lab to fend for ourselves after several other > "models" [ in evidence, with no direct genetic common ancestor any closer > than a horse and a donkey ] didn't make it. > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Cambridge>University of > Cambridge Professor <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mellars>Paul > Mellars, say evidence from < > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA>mitochondrial DNA studies > have been interpreted as evidence < > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution#Neanderthalensis>Neanderthals > were not a subspecies of H. sapiens.< > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal#cite_note-16>[17] > > Are Australia and Madagascar actually abandoned ancient mad scientist > laboratories ? > > ode [oink..what the heck do we really "know" ?? ] > > > > > At 07:14 AM 4/20/2010 -0700, you wrote: > >> Ode, >> >> I don't think it would be hard to prove the difference between foods >> naturally selected by nature over modern GMO foods of today. I doubt we'd >> find pig genes in corn or wasp genes in soybeans etc. >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ode Coyote" <[email protected] >> > >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 3:46 AM >> Subject: CS>The plow turns the field over...who is the field? >> >> >> ## "Subjective" MEANS the eyes and buds lie, the question is how much. >>> >> > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > > -- Gurdjieff-- How can you expect fairness and decency on a planet of sleeping people?
