It's the total amount ingested, not the strength of the solution that is important.
Dan On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> wrote: > Something does not compute about this. Hubble's protocol has one drink a > solution with no more than about 4/1000% of sodium chlorite in it. Whether > one starts with 5% or 28% solution before diluting it should make no > difference. > > Marshall > > Renee wrote: >> >> There's a big controversy over the safety of MMS as used by Jim Humble. >> There is an MMS list and we have a chemist on it, who says that the >> vomiting and diarrhea that comes from taking MMS the way Jim says is >> actually from chlorine poisoning rather than overload of die-off. He >> advocates (and uses) a 5% strength of sodium chlorite rather than the 28% >> MMS. There are those that have followed Jim's protocol and claim they've >> gotten their normal lives back after years of illness, and those that say >> "he saved my life" and so they are vehement against the chemist's gentler, >> safer protocol. Though he doesn't belong to the list, Jim came on to debate >> Tom and wound up looking bad (as in he could only defend himself by >> repeating 'I've given this to thousands of people and therefor it is safe'). >> Then there are those like me who go--if I had something really serious I >> was trying to kill I'd use Jim's (new) protocol--which, by the way, he >> changed from his original protocol because he finally had to admit, without >> actually admitting, that he did not understand the chemistry of sodium >> chlorite, nor what it does in the body, nor how long it is actually IN the >> body--of a few drops every few hours. BUT--for anything less serious I >> would certainly use the much safer 5% method the chemist recommends. As he >> says--it does the same thing as Jim's method, it just takes longer. There >> are situations where you don't mind it taking longer and then there are >> situations where you want it to be gone NOW. So I feel there is room for >> both. Jim, on the other hand, really hates anyone who tries to say his >> protocols aren't THE end to all illnesses. >> I've been using MMS since the web first heard about it, as MMS. Sodium >> chlorite, of course, has been used for decades before Jim brought it to >> public attention, with his own 'discovered' method. So you pretty much have >> to read both sides and choose for yourself. Sodium chlorite as MMS has >> always been a product of extremes. It does one thing for this person and >> the exact opposite for the next person, in every body response reported from >> MMS users. I've been on 2 MMS lists (one now defunct) for at least 3 years >> now and have 'seen it all'. MMS is an amazing thing, but it is MEDICINE, >> and should be handled with safety. Jim doesn't believe that there is >> anything at all unsafe about it. I know differently, but Jim refuses to >> acknowledge that. <shrug> >> Samala, >> Renee >> /-------Original Message-------/ >> Hi there, I've been seeing this on the MMS list. Project Greenlife are >> recalling MMS due to FDA 'pressure'/advice. It is on their website >> >> http://www.projectgreenlife.com >> They no longer sell MMS according to their site. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
