Let's just say it's a mess of indistinct direct contradictions saying
his stuff makes sense because he threw everything else in a bucket and
shook it it up.
That's nonsense, therefore, this is....
OH....just believe it BECAUSE you don't understand.
If it has a charge, it's ionic.
If it has mass and takes up space, it's "technically" a particle, so
elemental ions, ionic molecules and uncharged molecules and atoms are
particles and "particles " can be called either one but not both for the
same particle.
It's either ionic or it isn't.
If it's suspended rather than dissolved, it's a colloid.
So far as I know, ions can only exist in solution or as a plasma.
"Sol" is short for solution.
I think his twisted logic is that Ag2O is a metallic silver atom [colloid]
bonded to an unbalanced O2 molecule with a charge. [ion]..one electron
being shared with the silver ion to make it metallic and forming the bond.
Were they not bonded, he would be correct but it would be two distinct
particles...not both at the same time.
The same could be said, equally incorrectly, of the OH [-] anion ...ionic
molecule.
I think he's trying to claim that only elemental ions are ions and ionic
molecules are not and are therefore a colloid, but both are the same
"particle" as a molecule and are therefore both ionic and colloidal as a
"sol"--ution.
But dissolved solutions aren't colloidal suspensions, although you can
have both in the same container if they are distinct particles...but they
aren't.
IOW 1+3=12 and 12+3 =14 because 32+44 isn't 5....the statement as a
whole is true because all the elements are truly false and if you can't
see that commonality.... you can't deduce crap. [nearly as well as I can]
"Believers"..never complain or return their products, for to do so would
be to admit being gullible and the "faithful" cannot be gullible... or they
aren't faithful. [Two coins with the same single side flipping around and
around]
Don't believe it, don't buy it. [go away..it's not you I'm interested in ]
Believe and you're hooked into the cult of no returns and validation of
faith by recruitment of more believers.....a perfect self perpetuating sale.
That's called "Phishing" these days.
If the stuff actually works despite all the bullshit....that's OK...but
that's not the point.
Ode
At 06:37 PM 8/17/2010 -0700, you wrote:
Ode:
So, basically, Petersen's claim that his product is neither an ionic nor
colloidal form of silver - or a mix of the two, is without merit and
doesn't hold up to science...right?
John
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Jim Holmes <gooogleis...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Jim Holmes <gooogleis...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CS>pederson's silver
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 7:50 PM
A few moments of his video gave me that intuition, before any data was
offered Strange.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Ode Coyote <odecoy...@windstream.net> wrote:
This guy is calling brown pigs blue cows in a herd of goats dressed to
look like chickens.
Mixed terms, lies, misdirection, purposeful confusion and plain old BS.
Ode
At 10:35 AM 8/16/2010 -0600, you wrote:
Does anyone have personal experience with the silver product developed by
Dr. Gordon Pederson at
<<http://www.guardian-silver-health-supplements.com/learning/video/gordon-pedersen-silver-solution/>http://www.guardian-silver-health-supplements.com/learning/video/gordon-pedersen-silver-solution/>http://www.guardian-silver-health-supplements.com/learning/video/gordon-pedersen-silver-solution/?
Is there any way a layman could produce a product like it?
Leo
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions:
<http://www.silverlist.org>http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html>http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
