Carefull with that nothing toxic bit, have a look at your shampoo if it contains Sodium laurel ethol sulphate (SLES) do yourself a favour and do a search on it. It is a carcinogenic substance and it is used in just about every detergent, dishwashing liquid, or soap. Strange, they have even found it to be a superb shark repellant. They even add a small amount of formalin to reduce the chances of the soap going "off".( SLES makes the bubbles ). Regards James Houston-McMillan
evelyn mizner wrote: > I have found tea tree oil most effective to eradicate > lice. Rub it on the hair and scalp then shampoo with > a mild shampoo to which the tee tree oil has been > added > leave on the head in a lather for at least 1/2 Hour > -soap up again and rinse I like to finish with apple > cider vinegar. The hair will be soft and free of > bugs. You may need to repeat but even so it is easy > and no toxic stuff to deal with. Tingles the scalp a > bit! Your servant, Evelynll <> @mail.id.net> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Date: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 7:06 AM > > Subject: CS>Results of FDA intervention? > > > > > > Sam asks: > > > Is this archive protected from the general public > > and the FDA, > > > etc., per your earlier caution regarding > > newsgroups? > > > > Well, it was someone else who said that. Indeed the > > silver list is a > > bit more private than a newsgroup, but anybody can > > join. Plus, we're > > headed right now for greater visibility as I'm soon > > to summarize a > > lot of this stuff on the web site and provide tools > > there for signing > > up, etc. Great timing huh? > > > > In a word, no. The archive is open to the public. > > I'm not sure > > there's any reasonable way to limit it either. I'm > > open to any > > suggestions to deal with the technical issues > > involved, if it can be > > proved we can actually do anything worthwhile. > > > > > The FDA can take anything you say about silver and > > make it your > > > "label" thus disqualifying you from selling > > anything > > > silver-related. This could be a major setback for > > some on the list. > > > > That aspect of it won't be an issue for me > > personally, but I > > understand your worry. I guess it's time for me to > > read that entire > > congressional record thingie where the FDA published > > their new rule. > > > > Assuming the best for a bit, this ought to boil down > > to everybody in > > the (US) industry toning down their damn claims, > > relabeling their > > products, changing their ad copy to fit whatever > > wiggle room the feds > > have left them, and going on with business as usual. > > > > "Nature's antibiotic", "all known pathogens", blah, > > blah, blah... > > These are all bullshit and everybody here knows it. > > There are a few > > "pathogens" CS won't touch, it works nothing like an > > antibiotic, and > > is not natural in any sense of the word. But of the > > possible ways to > > weed out the junk, the fedgov moving in like a 600 > > pound gorilla is > > the absolute worst. > > > > The approach we've been trying here is really the > > only healthy way to > > upgrade the industry's performance. If consumers are > > knowledgeable > > going in, then they're ready to either ignore the > > bullshit, or vote > > with their dollars for those vendors who tell the > > unvarnished truth. > > > > Worst case, the whole alt-health industry gets > > driven underground, we > > lose the freedom to talk about it, and the bozos > > succeed in muzzling > > not just the hypesters, but everyone. So, in the > > guise of protecting > > us from our gullibility, they get to wipe out all > > competition for the > > medical/pharmaceutical establishment. > > > > Taken to the worst police state scenario, CS is > > declared contraband, > > anyone using it, giving it away, or God forbid using > > it "for the > > children", will be guilty of a crime, child abuse, > > or whatever. > > Parents would have kids taken from them. Info on CS > > making, like bomb > > recipes, would become "unprotected speech". > > > > The government's "War on Quackery" would ultimately > > be as much of a > > success as their "War on Drugs", "War on Poverty", > > etc. They'd create > > more quackery by driving all practices into the > > black market, leaving > > consumers without access to information or legal > > recourse. And they'd > > create an even bigger bureaucracy and more > > regulations to enforce it > > and further erosion of our civil liberties. All of > > which would please > > them no end. > > > > And many of your friends, neighbors, and family > > would applaud the > > whole thing, thinking they're being "protected." > > > > I hope no one is offended by my cynicism. I've tried > > to see it from > > all sides. The one thing I know, though, is that > > even most alt-health > > enthusiasts see nothing wrong with government > > intrusion ... into > > everybody *else's* lives. > > > > So now we stand to reap what fools have sown. > > > > (Boy what a downer! Sorry folks!) > > > > Mike D. > > > > [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] > > [[email protected] ] > > [Speaking only for myself... ] > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion > > of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an > > e-mail message to: > > [email protected] -or- > > [email protected] > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the > > SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: > > [email protected] > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
