On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 20:42:10 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>The coming destructon of the U.S.A. is due to apathy, and no where is it
>more prononced than on this list.
Won't happen in your lifetime, nor mine, and there's nothing wrong with this
list! A little melodramatic if you ask me.
>To say that standardization is a waste of time or should be ignored
>(Marsha) is utter folly as witnessed by the questions on the list today.
>Why is my CS changing color, why is it faloling out, should I heat the
>water blah blah?
Marsha is addressing the questions of confused/overwhelmed newbies and so am I.
In instances like that KISS is best (Keep It Simple, Stupid). Marshas' setup IS
a standard and it works well.
>There was a post by Ivan wherein he equated uS to PPM. I have just gone
>through 110 sheets of garphical data
What's Garphical Data?
>for CS runs that I have made under
>various conditions and have pulled out 44 that conatain both PPM and
>conductivity for the three classes of DW available hre in KC. , and
>within a given type of DW there is an obscure relation ship but it
>definitely is not a one to one. So scratch that notion.
>
>If some of you are mathematically inclined then review the .pcx file
>showing the five samples, and look at those curves. They appear to be of
>a second order equation. i.e. Y = AX^2 + kB, where "kB" is the Ic0.
>They should predict the time and PPM for the CS.
That the unlabeled ?.pcx with the resolution so low that it's unuseable?
Chuck
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather
because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
[email protected] -or- [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
