Seems fairly clear that they haven't actually said anything.
We know the concentration as near as is necessary. The only way to maintain
consistancy would be by using industrial equipment on a large scale with
constant monitoring throughout the entire production process, and then a week
later it will be different anyway. How did they handle "...all these road
blocks..."? And they've seen nothing like it cos the generator probly looks
different from other generators, is *that* what they mean by "seeing nothing
like it?"
All bunkum to me. And that's not a criticism, just an observation. Everyone
will say they have the best unit or produce the best stuff.
Unless other ingredients are added to the process everyone produces the same
stuff, the difference will be *what* is added, and *when* the product is
laboratory analysed after cessation of production. The total Ag content may be
determined, but the ion/particle ratio will vary according to when the sample
is analysed, and how it's analysed. {opinion}
Example: Immediately after cessation of production pH will be alkaline, 24
hours or a week later it will be closer to base 7.0 {based on personal
experience}.
N.
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:43:02 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: CS>Buying Generator
My requirements were clear: a unit that delivers high
quality colloidal silver in a known concentration. Especially the latter has
proven to be difficult. It became clear that
without determining the temperature and the conductivity of the water, a
correct value could not be calculated for
the concentration of the silver solution. But finally we handled all these road
blocks and now the new unit is available
and I have seen nothing like it on the
