This is what happens when money is involved, and people believe whatever
appears to be written better than another published blurb.
Everyone has the best unit on the market, and each of those units will produce
the best product, smallest particles, crystal clear solution, blah blah, and
anything and everything else is rubbish or poor quality....Bunkum!
Any wonder this stuff gets a bad rap, marketers competing for that dollar, and
then regulations start raising their ugly heads over the horizon.
They all produce the same stuff, and if nothing is pulled out of solution by
gravity over time, then that product is as good as it's gunna be.
Particle size and solution colour are but two half truths that get bandied
about. It's going to be efficacious regardless of 'supposed?' particle size
and colour of solution.
People should ignore published blurbs and just decide for themselves which
manufacturers unit they wish to purchase on the merit of the manufacturer not
the machine. All machines produce similar stuff. Although I make my own
units, the better way to make that decision is by speaking with people who are
willing to discuss it more honestly and openly without trying to push anything
or showing pretty pictures of lab results. Those pics are taken from a 'glass
slide', and do those pics represent the distribution of silver in the entire
solution, or just the best looking part of that solution, or even when that
solution was tested after cessation of production?
If 'x' unit functions as it should, the resultant product will be as good as it
can be, and word will spread, and that/those manufacturer/s will be guaranteed
repeat business, with a reputation to go with that business.
And THIS site is where I'd start looking for honesty an reputation. {opinion,
and excluding myself of course as I speak for myself only}
N.
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: CS>Buying Generator
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:11:18 -0500
>
> Question is not what it costs to make. Question is whether someone is
> willing to pay that amount to get the product it turns out. For me it was
> worth it enough to buy 4 units. Granted I got a discount on the follow-up
> units as a repeat customer.
>
> I too wish it was priced lower. It’s a very effective design and that's what
> we are paying for, the inventor's R & D.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Nave [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:01 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: CS>Buying Generator
> >
> > The Meissner research generator would be a good value if it
> > sold for about $20.
> >
> > Granted, some thought has been put into it, but it is merely
> > a resistor and batteries with silver electrodes.
> >
> > Overpriced at $200.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Scott Adams
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I have four of the Meissner Industries units and I am very
> > happy with them.
> > > According to the lab reports on the web site its claimed to
> > make some
> > > of the smallest particles of CS. Takes about 3 days to make a half
> > > gallon batch.
> > >
