"Jason R Eaton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Renee: > >In theory, yes. In practice, maintaining the purity of any signal is >problematic. It's easy to both measure and maintain any energy signal from a >device through a chamber and into a test tube. It's way beyond my technical >expertise to try and figure out how this could be done. > >Kind Regards, > >Jason
Jason, I'll simplify things for you. The only radiation a substance can emit is the thermal radiation from the temperature of the substance. This is how the infrared thermometers that you stick in your ear work. They are similar to the old exposure meters you used to use to take photographs, when you had to set the aperture and speed. But these ones detect the difference between the radiation absorbed by a thermocouple exposed to your ear, and another identical thermocouple that is shielded from the thermal energy. The thermocouples are well understood. The real magic is to develop op amps with a low enough offset voltage to measure the small differences, and run them off battery power. >From an electronic engineer's point of view, the real magic is the skill of the designer who can package this into a small device and sell it for peanuts. And still make it far more accurate than any mercury thermometer on the market. As far as channeling the energy, and all the other nice buzzwords involved in most of these web scams, the less you know, the more it will cost you to find out you have been taken. Best Regards, Mike Monett SilverCell -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
