perhaps shockingly, I have tried this method.....unsuccessfully. I placed several sterile hypodermic needles with the correct voltage and current. They were not silver, but Nordenstroms method was not silver. Silver introduces the de differentiation factor of Becker.

It seems that the tiny voltages found by Becker to be effective, and not only that, the correct polarity from the wound site, would be difficult to achieve when hoping for a healing or elimination of cancer. Is it not possible that the silver ions could still produce de differentiated cells without the proper voltage fields and this could be a bad thing? Elsewhere he shows that higher voltages, of the type that I commonly use in zapping, can promote cancer growth up to 600%, if I remember.

mg

On 1/4/2012 6:04 PM, Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
Several decades ago  an MD named Bjorn Nordenstrom, at the Karolinska 
Institute,  reported success in treating tumors with electrified needles 
applied, as I recall, directly to the tumors.    So far as I know, this method 
has not gained much acceptance.  I do not know why.




On 2012/01/05, at 9:18, Jason R Eaton wrote:

Greetings,

According to Becker's work contrasted with Bart Flick's work contrasted with 
Steven Quinto's work, the following statement can be made:

With the right amount of current (extremely small amount), silver ions 
delivered by this current can cause cancer cells to dedifferentiate, and thus 
return to a pre-cancerous state.  However, Becker refuted this claim; based on 
his work, it is clear that the RIGHT amount of current must be used.

Stephen Quinto followed up and studied the effect that silver ions had on human 
cancer cells, and found that the silver ion has the capability to destroy 
cancer cells.  His lab studies were never published, but they were very 
interesting.

However, I do not view silver as a primary treatment modality for cancer, as the silver 
ion must reach the cancer, and with cancer/tumors in the body, if you're not a surgeon, 
getting that task done "guaranteed" is not easy.

~Jason


From:<[email protected]>
To:<[email protected]>
Cc: "mgperrault"<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 16:04
Subject: Re: CS>brain a barrier?


What is uncontrolled de-differentiation?  Perhaps almost a cancer, perhaps a 
scar tissue, but
anyway, not good I can imagine.
So those who nebulize CS are increasing their chances of lung cancer?

Terry

---- mgperrault<[email protected]>  wrote:
Is there information on silver crossing the blood brain barrier?
Informed person says it does.   I witnessed someone putting a poultice
of c silver on the arm and this seemed to cause a slightly raised, de
pigmented scar tissue like area.

If I can vaguely remember, Becker said that silver can de differentiate
cells and that skin mediated voltage fields can sustain a re
differentiation and thus some regeneration of limb and bone, even
cancerous.  I may not have it right, but I dont have the book anymore.
Another part of the conundrum is that when the silver forms brown stains
on the colloidal making apparatus, this is very difficult to clean.  So
I imagine the silver staining the brain and causing dedifferentiation
and this seems totally frightening.  What is uncontrolled
de-differentiation?  Perhaps almost a cancer, perhaps a scar tissue, but
anyway, not good I can imagine.   Sorry if this has been covered, I
looked at the archives but didnt find anything....

thanks

mg


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:[email protected]>