Absolutely 100% spot on, you've got my vote <g>.
I tackled a woman a couple of years ago who had a kid less than one year old 
and it already had 4 vaccines, and she was lining that kid up for a 5th.  I 
asked her if she knew that a toddler must develop it's own natural immunities 
to things as a kid and all those jabs would be doing is impairing or retarding 
the bodies natural immune development as the kid gets older.  Of course I was 
ignored and considered an idiot - the classic brainwashed dux of the class 
{opinion}.  She obviously had never considered the fact that the establishment 
has got it wrong on the odd occasion?
Facts don't lie, if we were helped so much by cholesterol pills, vaccinations, 
pharma medications blah blah we should be bouncing with health, in fact it's 
the reverse, cholesterol is causing concern, more people are losing their 
minds, more people are coming down with diseases that are starting to make a 
comeback etc etc, we as a civilization are becoming more and more unhealthy and 
dependant on medications in most cases to keep people alive and functional.
I'm the cook here and if I drop anything on the floor in food preparation it 
still goes into the pot, my wife goes ape but I ask her how the hell did we 
ever get past the Neanderthal age if they worried about dropping a leg of 
mammoth that had been char burnt on an open fire on a *dirt* floor in their 
caves?  It's become a joke on me here cos I tell the family to get a grip on 
reality, and besides, I'm helping them develop a great natural immunity, they 
should be thanking me - LOL.  Bring 'em up tough I say, no room for wooses in 
this world.
N.

Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:27:43 -0500
Subject: Re: CS> OT health / Big pharma
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

One of the worst disservices that we have done to ourselves is the childhood 
vaccine programs, not that there haven't been some good things about them 
(small pox/polio)  but...   Most of us enter adulthood with immature immune 
systems.  An oversimplification for sure, but one could say that developing 
cancer is a failure of the immune system.  Children used to play outside in the 
dirt, etc..  their mothers didn't haul them off to the doctor's office for a 
magic pill every time they developed a little case of sniffles.  Years ago, 
most people didn't  have access to tylenol etc. to lower children's temps.  
Minor childhood diseases can serve a useful purpose.  I did say minor childhood 
diseases.. diseases  that are more disruptive and aggravating (like chicken pox 
or mumps) than dangerous.   'They' say we, of all preceding generations, live 
in almost pristine, sterile living conditions compared to our forefathers.  Has 
that made us a healthier population?

 
There was an article in the news a few years back that stated that cancer 
researchers discovered that people who took antibiotics were more likely to 
develop cancer, the implication being that somehow, taking a lot of antibiotics 
could cause cancer.  I think they got the cart before the horse.  The fact that 
more people who took antibiotics developed cancer is a given  if you reverse 
the theory.  That is...   because of a weakened or immature immune system or 
response, these people would become sick more often than others (requiring more 
antibiotic therapy)  and they would fall prey to cancer also because of a 
weakened or immature immune system.  In my opinion, if not for the immune 
response in human beings, the race would have become extinct a long time ago.  
So, between an immature immune system and a toxic environment, we seem to be 
sicker than ever.   Lola H.