No worries Dan, just expressing an opinion.
Literature states the body can absorb a particular level of mercury and
whatever else is some vaccines contain without causing health issues, but if
giving vaccines in the number that's around today, and at such a vulnerable
age, combined with the many vaccines that are available for this and that - how
much is too much over time? I haven't read anything about issues which may
become prevalent 40 years after such volumes of vaccinations? Combine that
with an annual flu jab over many years, I just have to wonder.
Cancers, Altzheimers etc etc seem to be more prevalent nowadays, and I don't
believe it's just because it's publicised more today that we hear about it.
There's probly not too many families out there that doesn't have an older
rellie who has lost their mind, and cancers in a wider range of age groups and
from all walks of life seem to be on the increase. The poor quality of
foodstuffs we consume today can account for some {opinion} but again, combine
that with innumerable vaccines which many people, especially young mums with
toddlers and school age kids are being coerced into getting by the
establishment and my money is on - something stinks or is not quite right here?
If I may digress here for a second as others are discussing Polio, I will
relate a story told to me by my mother many many moons ago...A kid lived across
the road from us when I was just starting school {I remember the kid vaguely}
and his mother was terrified of Polio, so every toy that kid got, his mother
used to boil in water, every time he went inside from being outside that kid
had to wash his hands etc etc, and HE contracted Polio? I was the typical
mucky kid getting into all manner of dirt and crap in the neighbourhood and I
am fine. I just have to wonder about vaccines, moreso the quantity of them
being pushed on people today. My wife has a considerable 'dent?' in her arm
due to a vaccine she got when she was a kid, was that a dirty needle? Was
something wrong with that particular vaccine back then? Who knows? It was
over 50 years ago?
I'd like to read a suitable study spanning 40-50 years on people who have
health issues today, or who suffer from some affliction in the older age group,
and trace the history, but I doubt I'd come across anything remotely resembling
such a study as long as my bum points to the ground. If there was no risk then
they would not have that little rider, which is actually a Caveat Emptor, of no
comeback to the establishment should something go wrong? Everyone else can get
sued for whatever reason, but not the establishment or pharmaceutical
companies? That doesn't instil trust in the establishment from me that's for
sure.
I've heard others say it helps the immune system too, but I can't subscribe to
that theory, just my personal opinion that's all. How many cases of Polio and
other serious issues statistically are noted in countries of far inferior
health and hygiene environments than ours, and who don't get vaccinated for
almost any reason? My philosophy is..."Only dead fish go with the flow", and
I'm far from dead at the moment, and I sure don't Thank todays technology or
medicine men/women for that <g>. I keep coming back to old Neanderthal man, he
made it through without all todays laboratory produced concoctions, in fact I
could probly say *I* was a bit Neanderthal as a kid, as most kids would have
been around my age group, give or take 10 years or so <g>. Of course he's
extinct now, but so will we be sometime in the future I'm sure.
There may well be some inherent value in vaccines - but how many is too many?
Seems like we could have quite a cocktail floating around in our systems, and
we know what happens if we imbibe in too many cocktails, something gets a
little out of kilter.
Just thought I'd throw that little rant in, probly senseless to some, but makes
sense to me as a Neanderthal thinker <g>.
N.
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:53:56 -0600
> Subject: Re: CS> OT health / Big pharma
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Neville,
>
> I think you have some of that wrong. Vaccinations are given precisely
> for the purpose of having the body mount an immune response. You can
> make a case for problems caused by additives like thimerosol, and
> unintended hitchhiking viruses etc, but these are separate issues from
> the inherent value of vaccines. One criticism might be that the
> immune system becomes too reactive because of these vaccinations.
>
> Dan
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Neville Munn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Absolutely 100% spot on, you've got my vote <g>.
