Good point Dave. I should not imply that there was intent to spread FUD about silver. A lot of these things do so out of ignorance, or it is simply an unintended side effect. In either case, I still find that the article is not useful for promoting CS/EIS.
Victor On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have to understand the perspective of the people who write this sort > of thing. They are writing for developers who will try to find some sort > of silver to put into a capsule that you can take with the antibiotic. EIS > does not even fit into their reckoning, they don't even consider it, one > way or the other. You, however, can use EIS along with antibiotic and get > the best of both worlds... > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:02 AM, <bodhipakkh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 2, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Victor Cozzetto wrote: >> >> Exactly. >> >> These types of reports are used to spread FUD - Fear, Uncertainty, and >> Doubt. Sometimes it is very subtle, which is the worst kind, as it goes >> unnoticed. >> >> If I try to use such a report to encourage a layman to use CS, he will >> only come away with FUD, and a reaffirmation that his antibiotics are the >> way to go. >> >> We must remain vigilant against FUD. >> >> Victor >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Neville <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'll just throw my two bobs worth in here... >>> >>> There is nothing of which represents Electrolytically Isolated Silver >>> dispersed in Distilled Water *alone* used by any research I have found in >>> over 10 years of my involvement with this stuff. I'm just a mug punter, >>> but as a mug punter I do not put *any* credence in *any* report from >>> *any* written word from the establishment or research facilities >>> offered to the public to contemplate. >>> >>> It's one of two things - either efficacy by design, or guilt by >>> association. >>> >>> Whatever is used is something which has gone through a proprietary >>> process so as to make results legal for use and/or publication in any media >>> for public perusal. >>> >>> Your FDA, our TGA, and I would suggest any and all other authoritative >>> bodies on this planet do not reference silver dispersed in distilled water >>> *alone*, it just isn't legal to do so from my understanding. Silver and >>> water are both natural substances hence cannot be patented and health >>> claims cannot be made without it being forced to jump through many hoops >>> first, and that ain't happening any time soon. >>> >>> No health claims can be made unless it's gone through the mill to >>> satisfy the establishment set requirements prior to publication! In other >>> words, everything I read in any media report is taken as BS, unless what I >>> read satisfies MY requirements! >>> >>> N. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:34:42 -0500 >>> From: mdud...@king-cart.com >>> To: silver-list@eskimo.com >>> Subject: Re: CS>Silver Makes Antibiotics Thousands of Times More >>> Effective - Scientific American >>> >>> I don't think so. That would be ionic silver compounds, such as silver >>> nitrate. >>> >>> Marshall >>> >>> On 11/2/2014 2:28 PM, Ron wrote: >>> >>> On the other hand they did not actually say colloidal but said : "Collins >>> and his team found that silver — in the form of dissolved ions". Is that >>> subject to interpretation? >>> Ron >>> >>> On 11/2/2014 2:36 AM, Victor Cozzetto wrote: >>> >>> Yea, that article is definitely propaganda backed by pharmaceutical >>> companies. Trying to highlight antibiotics while spreading false fears >>> about silver toxicity and CS turning you blue. Well, I am still alive and I >>> am not blue ;-) >>> >>> Victor >>> >>> >>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/silver-makes-antibiotics-thousands-of-times-more-effective/ >>> >>> >> >> >
