Thanks. We knew you would correct the errors. There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.
Henry David Thoreau > On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Ode Coyote <silverpuppy1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The article contains a number of inaccurate points and and terminology > conflicts, never mentioning the difference between suspended [charge neutral] > "particles" and dissolved [positively charged] ions...nor the varying > proportions of each or the fact that in electro-colloids, most of the > "particles" are not "pure metallic" silver but consist mainly of silver > hydroxide and some amount of silver oxide. > The electron microscope will NOT represent particle sizes in "EIS" as > preparing the sample actually CREATES what it takes pictures of and what it > shows was never in the water. > He is also wrong about why colored glass storage is recommended. It's a > legacy of using buffers like salt or baking soda creating photo reactive > silver compounds while using nothing but pure silver and pure water make none > of these. > He has not heard of current density or the fact that voltage is only relevant > in controlling current. That "Golden Mist" is in fact silver oxide being > formed in the water [rather than in the diffusion layer so it will stay on > the electrode] because the Nernst diffusion layer was oversaturated [over > loaded] due to using too much current over too little electrode surface area > and it's that silver oxide that overwhelmingly contributes to the yellow > color while Rayleigh light scattering effects from particle sizes are quite > minor, being that very little of the total silver content is a particle at > all of ANY size. [ions are all one size, far too small to refract light in > the visible wavelengths ] > > Distillation is but one way to de-ionize water. There is zero difference in > the end result if either is done well. > > ...well, typical of "journalism" where the writer has no direct knowledge of, > or experience with what he is writing about. > If his grasp on energy physics is as loose as that, I'll not bother to read > what he says about 'free energy' > > Is Peter Lindemann related to the well respected UFO researcher Michael > Lindemann? > > Ode > >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Phil Morrison <philmorrison...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Research Study By Professional >> >> http://free-energy.ws/pdf/cs_closer_look.pdf >
