Thanks PT, in that case what the heck would be happening when using Revitive or Quell? Maybe it's too much to ask. It's tempting to think that all a company would need to do to lend some legitimacy to some cockamamie approach to wellbeing, would be to pay a lot of money to the related agency.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 8:13 AM, PT Ferrance <ptf2...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > It doesn't sound like it to me, Reid. The BE units I have used require > the electrodes to be near blood vessels on the wrist because that is a > place the blood flows close to the skin. > PT > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Reid Harvey <reidharvey7...@gmail.com> > *To:* Silverlist Post <silver-list@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 26, 2018 4:22 AM > *Subject:* CS>blood electrification > > CS Listers one and all, > > Having been off the list for long I'm a bit unfamiliar with topics other > than silver, whether followed or not. Years ago there was much of interest > about *blood electrification - BE.* > > I wonder about two products advertised on TV: Revitive and Quell and do > these use BE? This might show an open-mindedness on the part of government. > > Retrieve involves, of course, a device one stands on, some sort of healing > force then traveling upword through the body. Quell does much the same, > using a device strapped on the lower leg. > > When last I followed BE here we were informed about gauze wrapped bare > wire placed on either side of the artery at the wrist as a good approach. > > Can somebody tell me, do Revitive and Quell appear to involve blood > electrification? Thanks, > > Reid > > >
