Marshall wrote: > Considering that they called silver a heavy metal, I would not put much credance in any of the rest of > it. Obviously they have not done proper research.
Research into what? Whether silver is a heavy metal or not? Would you ignore the message because the messenger calls his donkey a horse, or fill in the ditch because the ditch digger calls his shovel a spade? The researchers are looking at silver as a water pollutant and toxic metal to water creatures, and so choose toxic metal terminology. In fact they conclude that while the toxicity of silver is high to marine micro-organisms, it is low to marine creatures, and very low to vertebrates. The main interest in this report, to my mind, is the actions of silver in the body and the olgliodynamics it displays. This is a very good report, as it does not have an agenda to follow. Ivan. ----- Original Message ----- From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 24 December 1999 06:48 Subject: Re: CS>Re: weak medicine revisited > Considering that they called silver a heavy metal, I would not put much credance in any of the rest of > it. Obviously they have not done proper research. > > Marshall > > Fred wrote: -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
