In a message dated 10/31/00 2:54:47 PM EST, [email protected] writes: << Now, this method and this tester may not be the ideal (the very best way to go) protocol. I'm sure there are much more sophisticated and expensive laboratory equipment and procedures available. However, the question I have for the tech people is quite simple: What's wrong with this for the average home based maker of CS? Is this tester sufficiently adequate for our use? Or do the benefits of HV generators and other testing methods significantly outweigh this method? Comments, please? Regards, Robert Bartell >>
Bob: My only objection to it is the problem of CS stability over time, particularly if you produce relatively large particles as you appear likely to do with the setup you described above. The LVDC apparatus I used in the past never went above 140 ma, but the drop out rate was pretty high after 3-4 weeks. So if you make a fresh batch every 2-3 weeks, most LVDC setups should be OK. If you want to store it longer than that, you're better off with a more sophisticated setup. I believe some can be purchased, but others are more knowledgeable that I am in that area. Roger -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
