Dear Brooks et al:
Your findings are excellent! Thank you for sharing this simple protocol...
Two years ago I got in a severe fight ( not really a fight fight ) with a
talented and highly respected surgeon over just this issue. He kept screaming
back at me ( I was trying to help save a life - the individual was critically
hospitalized with just such an infection and dying, I was trying to get the
individual into a hyperbaric chamber ) "There just isn't enough evidence to
warrant it!!!!!" over and over again.
At the time I thought he was being very stubborn and closed-minded - every
single alternative had been attempted with dismal failure. However, in
retrospect, I realized that he didn't want to spell the truth out: That
critical care hyperbaric chamber treatments are expensive and often not covered
by insurance - he had felt as powerless as I.
It is excellent to know that minor modifications in such environmental
conditions can make a difference!
Dear Gage,
Almost without exception, cases of this type (most especially in the
elderly) involve some form of veinous stasis or similar
circulatory insufficiency. We conducted some rather extensive evaluations of
lower extremity circulation experimentations/evaluations during
1999-2000.......almost exclusively on geriatric group volunteers. In the most
serious challenges, multiple protocols were required----especially
hyperbaric-type environmental modifications. One, very simple, technique
involved the utilization of clear plastic "garbage bags". The entire lower
leg....up to the knee....was encased in the bag and suitable taping or pressure
was applied to the top edges to maintain a very low---or NO---pressure loss.
Using a small plastic tube, 02 was used to inflate the bag to its full capacity
(high pressures WERE NOT required for acceptable results). We found that 20
to 30 minute applications, executed approximately every 4 hours during the day
period were (in a majority of cases) sufficient to MAKE THE DIFFERENCE between
complete remission.....and "control".
This modality proved to be very economical, simple, and is
certainly within the reach of even the most "financially stressed"
experimenter.
For a more complete explanation of the "exactly" how we
conducted these evaluations......contact me "off-list".
I must go now. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
Gage Tarrant wrote:
Hello, I have a question about commercial CS & need some advice on strength
for a client of mine. She is 79 years old and has infected leg wounds on her
very fragile skin that are just simply not clearing up. Her doctors are doing
all kinds of things, including prescribing antibiotics ( which, of course, wipe
her out) , and I know that CS would clear this up rather quickly. She has had
these 3" open wounds for a month now, so I'm going to butt in and get her some
CS. My question is about strength: I've seen and used some CS by "Innovative'
that is dark brown and claims to be 500 ppm. I bought a small bottle to try it
out and it did indeed clear up the insect bites I applied it to on myself
overnight. Is this a good strength, or is higher ppm unnecessary and a myth?
I hear about you guys doing wonders with 5 ppm and I'd just like to hear some
history of higher ppm use. Thanks. Gage
