I had been told that there really wan't any word for the many, instead they would throw up their hands and have a helpless look on their faces once they got beyond 3.
Marshall Ode Coyote wrote: > Isn't that "One, a couple, a few, several" then many? > > Nit picking math.. > er, one nit is two-many :-) > How's that for an equation? > Ken > > At 04:55 PM 6/27/01 -0400, you wrote: > >Roger wrote: > > > >> Frank: I would appreciate it if you could cite the references that support > >> your statement, "Many researchers are convinced that very small particles > >> (under 10 nm) in high concentration is most desired." Thanks, Roger > > > >In the aboriginal number systems, many comes after three (as in one, two, > three, many), so I only need to find one more beyond myself, Dr. Maass, and > Dr. Gibbs. Perhaps Marshall will sign on. > > > >frank key > > > > > >-- > >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > >[email protected] -or- [email protected] > >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >
