Ivan Are you making these little machines to do this, or have you got them? I would be interested in getting one since their are 2 asthmatics in the family, and with Beks and her respiratory problems, this could be helpful. How long ago did Brooks post this? I must have missed it. Or is this advising people to try and make their own? I must admit to being a little nervous to doing that. Can we get these air brush sets here? Or would Brooks send one with payment to him? Brooks?
Please let me know Tracy ----- Original Message ----- From: Ivan Anderson <[email protected]> To: *Silver-List* <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 21:03 Subject: CS>Re-post CSXO2 nebuliser (nebulizer)...complete > Folks, > I had occasion to refer someone to this protocol, but had trouble finding > the complete series, so I decided to consolidate them in one message for > easy reference (plus a few extras). Once again, thanks Brooks. > > Ivan. > > > ***The protocol: > > To all interested list members. > I would like to relate an experimental protocol recently developed > by one of our younger (and brighter) staff members. He originated the idea > and assembled all parts into a working model in less than two > days-------after his original inspiration. The original problem manifested > as a result of our fruitless search for some effective procedure for > attacking the bi-lateral form of those bacterial pneumonias which have > proved non-responsive to all of the anti-biotic protocols. This challenge > has been especially dear to our hearts since one of our engineers lost his > 47 year old wife (a wonderful school teacher), at the age of 47--------nine > years ago. > We have used this system on 3 volunteers----and this only----within > the past four weeks. However, we have been absolutely astounded by the > results. One 75 year old ashma sufferer, unable to gain more than > momentary relief during the past 8 years, was able to dispense with his very > labor-intensive (unbelieveably costly) hospice-assisted > protocols............18 days after undertaking this protocol. We now > suspect that his ashma was the result of some form of secondary bacterial > pathogen......this because of the speed and degree of his recovery. > Another of our volunteers (71 years), afflicted with a sub-clinical > bronchial infection-----non-responsive to any protocol----including Rife > Beam Ray Therapy, has improved by at least 75% within the past 21 > days.........and shows every indication of complete resolution within the > next week or so. This volunteer was in perfect health in every other > way----except for the bronchial disorder (complicated by a minor but > persistant post-nasal drainage) > The third volunteer was an 81 year old male, completely > non-responsive to all therapies for bi-lateral pneumonia of a bacterial > nature. This condition had persisted for 6 months and he was approaching a > moribund state, very rapidly. 24 hours after beginning this protocol, he > encountered a very serious crisis evolving from major Herxheimer's > Reaction. Pustule formation was so rapid and intense, 100% oxygen support > was required----and the treatment protocol was suspended for two days, while > the volunteer's condition was stabilized. Two days after resumption of the > Oxygen-CS protocol, no supporting O2 therapy was required as the subject > was fully able to breathe adequately unassisted. The volume of sputum/pus > fluid was massive. Excepting very sore chest area (from prolonged coughing) > the volunteer was much improved. Within five days he became very alert and > began to overcome his narcoleptic tendencies. Within ten days he became > ambulatory again. Within 15 days his lungs were unobstructed enough he > could breathe fully, with no audio evidence of fluid presence in the > pulmonary tract. Yesterday (the 21st day) his lungs checked to be 90% > clear, with only one tiny spot in the lower left quadrant of the left lung. > His M.D. pulmonary specialist is in a state of "schock" over the > developments. His analysis is this is the most pronounced case of > "spontaneous remission" in his 30 years of practice. No one has informed > the M.D. of our experimental protocols, used on this volunteer. Our > volunteer's immediate family is so irate over the fact that his alleopathic > pulmonary "team" was totally unable to reverse his decline toward immediate > life-departure (the crisis management team did offer to place him on 100% > life support until clinical death) they wanted to instigate some form of > legal action. We reminded them of their earlier agreement with us, that > regardless of the outcome of our experimental protocol, "neither the > procedural result nor the protocol itself, would be broached with the > volunteer's alleopathic counsel". Additionally, based upon the anecdotal > nature of this one case, there is no way to prove efficacy. > THE PROTOCOL; This consists simply of using a nebulizing system > constructed from a conventional artist's air-brush assembly, with modified > pneumatic plumbing facilitating its connection to a pressure-regulated pure > O2 supply. The air-brush mechanism was chosen because it provides an > exeptionally economcal means of furnishing a very small particle aerosol fog > (4 micron vicinity). Using a very simple adapter from the air-brush > pressure regulator, to the O2 supply hose coupling, plus a standard welding > system size oxygen fitting (female), the assembly is connected directly to > the Oxygen port outlet from either a small medical-type O2 bottle---or a > standard welding system O2 bottle outlet (they both contain the same purity > oxygen). > Using the small fluid-supply bottle which comes in the air-brush kit, > then filling the supply bottle approximately 3/4ths full (about 1/2 ounce) > of 5 ppm CS, we were ready to start. The O2 system (we used two-stage > regulators) was SLOWLY set for constant regulation at 35 psi, at which point > the system was ready for use. We placed the air-brush in the hand of the > volunteer, who in turn pressed the push-valve button when they wanted to > direct the O2/CS fog mixture into their mouth-----and inhale directly into > the pulmonary system. At the end of each inhalation, the volunteer simply > released pressure on the button and shortly exhaled. This procedure was > repeated until the entire contents of the air-brush supply bottle was below > the intake point of the supplu-siphon tube (about 50-75 breaths total). > This protocol was employed twice daily (24 hours) for the entire duration of > these researches. > I will post the bill-of-materials, plus assembly details in another > post sometime tomorrow. However, as a word of encouragement for those > unable to afford the $680.00 for a hospital-type nebulizer, the total cost > of our assembly, less the oxygen bottle and regulator, was less than $20.00. > Additionally, our particle size was BETTER from the $10.85 Taiwanese > bargain-brush, than from our $680.00 hospital-grade nebulizer (at least our > measurements indicated so). I will. also, tell you where you can purchase > these air-brush kits . We have, already purchased 20 of them; outfitted > them, and given them to very needy Experimental Volunteers of a charity > nature. Within the next 8 weeks, we should have some useable "raw" data, > which I will attempt to share with interested list members. > Please forgive this lengthy post, but my excitement over this > exceptionally low-cost----and promising protocol, has been keeping me awake > nights......lately. > May you all be well. Sincerely. Brooks Bradley. > > > ***Parts list and assembly: > > Good Afternoon List Members. > Following is a list of the components required for enabling > the protocol we used in the experimental researches I outlined last > evening. > The air-brush kit we used, was obtained from a mail-order > concern specializing in myriad hardware/electrical/hand-tool items. > Their quality is toward the low-end industrial, but quite adequate for > the home/hobby user. Our machine shop/proto-type builders have used > them for years. The company is Harbor Freight, located in Camarillo, > California. They now have outlets in one or two other cities. We > obtained our air-brush kits from the Fort Worth, Texas store (we are > located in Fort Worth). The stock number is #6131. Our purchasing > person informed me this item cost us less than $10.00 each, and the > last 20 purchased cost less than $8.00. As of last Wednesday, this > store still had some of these units. Included in the kit are two > liquid -supply bottles (one 1/2 and one 1 oz), one air hose which > couples between the pressure regulator and the air-brush assembly; > one air pressure regulator; and the air-brush assembly itself. The > additional parts required are for a hose assembly which facilitates > coupling the input side of the air pressure regulator with the > external oxygen supply used to power the nebulizer. > Note: PURCHASE BRASS FITTINGS ONLY, oxygen is the > pre-eminent combustion supporter. > All of these components can be obtained from any > commercial outlet stocking pneumatic system parts. > This hose assembly includes: > One 1/4" Compression X 1/8" Male NPT fitting (this > is very important, for without it you cannot connect the O2 hose to > the air-brush pressure regulator) > One 1/4" Barb X 1/8" NPTF Fitting > One 1/4" X 9/16 RH Oxygen Fitting (will have a barb > fitting on one end and the female coupling on the other) > Approximately 4 feet of any good !/4 I.D. 200+ > PSI air hose. Tell the clerk you are going to use oxygen in the > hose. > Assemble the parts by screwing the Compression > fitting into the 1/4" Barb X 1/8" Male NPT fitting. Do not worry, > only one end of the Compression fitting is compatible with the Barb > fitting. Next, insert the barb end of this fitting assemby into the > air hose. Push the hose on until it is jam against the shoulder of > the fitting. Any small, screw or compression-type clamp may be used > to add security to the hose/fitting end. Next, insert the barb end of > the Oxygen fitting into the remaining hose end and secure with any > satisfactory clamp. Your assembly is now complete. Next, carefully > screw the exposed male end of the Compression fitting into the bottom > of the air-brush pressure regulator. Now connect the small-diameter > air-line between the air-brush assembly and the pressure regulator (it > is fool-proof, as there is nowhere else this tiny hose can connect). > Select the small fluid-supply bottle and fill > approximately 75-80% of capacity with 5-10 ppm Colloidal Silver and > insert the angled tip assembly into the bottom of the air-brush > assembly. You are now ready to connect to your O2 supply and operate. > Obtain a small medical O2 bottle (anywhere around 1/2 > to 1 cubic feet capacity) or any size O2 Arc welding system bottle. > Be sure to have a Two-stage regulator attached to the O2 bottle. Now, > connect the 9/16" Oxygen-fitting to the O2 outlet from the Two-stage > regulator (also foo-proof, as there is nowhere else to connect). Now > SLOWLY open the O2 control knob on the O2 regulator and set the inlet > prssure to your nebulizer assembly to a Maximum of 35 Pounds Per > Square Inch (PSI). Next, screw the AIR-BRUSH air pressure > regulator control knob (the tiny knob on top of the air pressure > regulator) all the way closed.. Now, open the control knob about 2 > and one-half turns. Next, trigger the control botton on the > Air-brush head until you see a fine fog each time you press down on > the > button. The mist is so fine, you may have to hold it against a dark > back ground to see it. You are now ready to go. > Our best results were obtained by the volunteer inserting > the discharge nozzle about 1 inch inside their OPEN mouth and > breathing deep---an long---on each inhalation; holding the breath for > a count of 3 or 4 and then executing a complete exhalation. Ideally, > there should be about 1/4" circular clearance around the air-brush > head (while inside the mouth), as this provides the optimum venturi > action for incorporating air with the O2. In acute circumstances, the > volunteer can close his/her mouth completely around the nozzle and > breathe 100% O2------works great. > Remember NEVER USE PURE OXYGEN NEAR OPEN FLAMES OR > COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. To do so would make this protocol quite > irrelevant. > Good luck to all, and if you have any questions just post > them and I will try to answer. Sincerely. Brooks Bradley. p.s. > Any serviceable air-brush assembly could be used. However, try to > obtain one that will yield the smallest size particle possible. > > > ***PS to parts list: > > Dear List Members. > I failed to include a suggestion, which some may find of > critical importance. If you do not have immediate access to an O2 > supply, and encounter an EMERGENCY experiment, you can connect into > any available air compressor outlet (however, youmay have to change > out the Compressor-side fitting). To be safe, let the air compressor > charge to 35 psi and disconnect it from the power grid. There will be > ample air pressure to execute your protocol. The air-brush will > function quite well to below 20 psi. Although your air-supply may be > contaminated....the alternative to getting CS into the VOLUNTEER > animal/pet may a much more grave situation, > We had excellent, but less spectacular results using > compressed air as the driving medium in some animal experiments in > 1998.......when addressing some serious pulmonary compromises > involving felines. > Sincerely. Brooks Bradley. > > > ***Further to assembly: > > To all interested list members. > Since I posted the original information about the > air-brush nebulizer (as developed and employed by one of our technicians) I > do feel constrained to answer the question as to why use a two-stage > regulator. Please recall my original post was designed to allow persons > with access to welding equipment, to capitalize on this without further > expense. Furthermore, most commercial oxygen bottles are charged to a VERY > HIGH pressure (in the neighborhood of 2000-3000 psi). Safety precautions, > alone, recommend that a two-stage regulator is a wise precaution. In case > of a regulator malfunction wherein the safety burst-disc failed to rupture, > the down-stream portion of your system would be exposed---instantly---to > system pressure......if only a single-stage was employed. Not a very > desireable circumstance involving O2 at 2000 psi. Two-stage regulation > mitigates against this. > Additionally, I was never recommending this economical > little system to replace or compete with ANYTHING. I am somewhat dismayed > that some of the newer membership seems to have seized upon such a > probability. My original intent was to encourage those among you----who > desired--- to experiment with a very economical and useful methodology > providing some characteristics not readily available at low cost. To wit: > small particle size; and compatibility with pressurized fluid systems > supplied by non-dependent accessories. We gained comparable performance > from this little system that equated---very well---to a $650.00 > hospital-approved system (which required special demand-type regulators, a > separate pumping/pressurization system, etc.) The original cost of the > air-brush assembly, plus fittings and hoses, was under $20.00 U.S. > Additionally, for those having access to a conventional air compressor > system, they may avail themselves of this option at NO REGULATOR system > cost. This may be achieved, simply, by charging the air tank to 35 psi and > cutting it off. The system will work quite well---in a declining pressure > mode, down to 20 psi. > I hope this information is of some value. > Sincerely. Brooks Bradley. > > > ***Efficiency of this nebuliser > > To interest list members. > I believe it to be worth commenting on, that > during our more intense researches in this area (1997-1998), we were > unable to generate useful results from ANY type of conventional > vaporizer......REGARDLESS OF COST of the device. The mist-particles were > just too large and the mist-cloud concentrations too sparsely > populated.....to give the desired result. > Well-designed nebulizers, used in a > concentrated-delivery mode were the only methodology which yielded > satisfactory results-----for us! > In the near future I will post a simple, but > I believe useful----explanation of what actually happens (the physics of > venturi action, turbulence, changes in static and ram pressure in the > mouth, throat, and upper lungs). Such information may prove useful in > understanding some of the problems involved in transporting entrained > substances into the pulmonary tract. > I must leave now. > Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. . > > > > ***The silver transport vehicle: > > Janine, and all interested list members. > Please be advised this is a circumstance I can not > address professionally, as we do not give medical advice or any form of > medical consultation. > I can, however, make a few observations that may be of some value to > you in your personal researches. First, we have found that several factors > have to be in place....and acting in concert, to yield satisfactory > results----from among our volunteer experimental populations. We found it > essential that: (1) The colloidal silver employed MUST be of the proper > particle size ( the ppm concentration was less of a factor). (2) A > MSM/DMSO mixture of approximately 80% MSM and 20% DMSO was needed as an > effective penetration/transport mechanism. (3) Pure oxygen was required > as > the gas-drive. (4) The mist-particle size was of consequence, also. The > finer mist clouds, driven at higher pressures (30 to 35 psi) seemed to carry > further into the lower pulmonary regions before terminal attachment. > In all circumstances where we were unable to get the CS > solution into direct contact (across the mucosa-ladened barrier), we had > only limited success. > Assuming you successfully generated a CS x pathogen > interface, I am deeply puzzeled by your announced results. I can offer no > further comment on this circumstance. > Sympathetically yours. Brooks Bradley. > > p.s. The inhalation technique was, also, of some consequence. Deep, slow > inhalations where the volunteer discharged the mist for approximately 4 or 5 > seconds, shutting it off while continuing the inhalation to the count of > 8.....seemed the ideal. If the volunteer had insufficient lung capacity to > maintain an 8 second inhalation, the ratio should be maintained at 50% > airbrush ON and 5O% Off for scavenge breathing (completing the inhalation) > for whatever their inhalation time constant is. e.g. 6 seconds> 3 seconds > on for airbrush discharge, and 3 seconds continued inhalation after airbrush > shut-down. > > > ***Case study: > Dear Mr. Bassett. > I have just read your posts; I have a little comment > that may be of value to you in your experimental research. We have > evaluated CS, and many methods of its employment. Only one was ever > rapidly effective in an "essentially terminal" evaluation. This involved a > volunteer (male, > 72 yrs.), during the winter of 1998. He was suffering from late-stage > bi-lateral bacterial pneumonia. The methodology employed in these > experiments included the following protocol: Using a very fine particle > nebulizer, a 25 psi to 35 psi, regulated O2 supply as the gas drive and a > colloidal silver > mixture---compounded as follows: Starting with 8 ounces of 10 ppm CS > (warmed to approx. 105 degrees F.) dissolve methyl sulphonyl methane (MSM) > in this solution to the point of saturation (until no more will go > into solution); he next added 20%--by volume--(approximately 2 fluid ounces > of DMSO, undiluted) to the parent mixture. Using this material in a very > simple nebulizer fashioned from an artist's airbrush, we were able.....in > this case....to witness an astonishing, rapid, recovery from this moribund > individual. > The patient used approximately 3/4 of an ounce of liquid (in the smaller of > the aribrush fluid supply vials). every 4 hours. Within 48 hours his lungs > started to clear (his lung capacity was around 25% when this protocol was > instituted and his attending physcians had openly resigned themselves to his > immediate demise). > The rapid onset of pus and mucosa-bound bacterial debris did, indeed, place > a biological challenge on him. > The volume of this material was astonishing. We believe that the > accompanying oxygen, plus the transporting capability of the MSM/DMSO > combination.....were critical to this splendid outcome. > We do not prescribe medicine....or give any type of medical > advice, being , STRICTLY, an experimental research organization. I am, > simply, relating a case in which a non-toxic protocol seemed to be > of efficacy in a very CHALLENGING circumstance. > Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.. > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
