I just looked at 10 samples over a year old stored hap hazardly in the living room in a basket of samples. Some made by constant current LVDC at .8ma and some made by CCLVDC at 1.9ma constantly stirred in process. 2 samples have turned blackish. Both of these were stored in a clear container less than half full. Correction: One of these is actually clear and unchanged at the original meter reading of 22 PPM but the container has a blackish residue on it. The other was run at 1.5ma stirred and the liquid has turned. One stored in amber glass, run stirred at 5 ma went medium yellow in 2 months and is now pale violet. Meter reading dropped by 4 PPM. TE increased All other samples remained the way they were made as long as the container was full, clear bottle or not. One 4.5 ma sample in a clear container with very heavy TE remains unchanged even though the container is 1/4 full.
In short None have PPM meter reading changes after over a year except the violet one. Where TE was noted, no changes..except the violet one. Nothing settled, one developed a deposit on the container sides but remained clear itself and one sample turned blackish [probably shortly after running it]. In another 10 batches or so, made for my use Constant Current LVDC at 1.9 ma/constant stir, 17PPM meter reading ,medium heavy TE in clear glass on kitchen counter and not really kept track of date wise but less than a year old, I've had about 3 of them go straight from clear to pale violet within a months or so time but only during the winter in a wood heated house. One day clear, the next day violet. Another went murky reddish violet. Tossed all 4 out without checking with meter. Ken At 08:29 PM 10/4/01 -0400, you wrote: >I have no storage problem. >If you're getting fallout, you're either running the process too long or you're >doing something really dumb like cleaning the container. > >I never have, even with the 3 battery LVDC stuff. > I make it, then use it 'till it's gone. >The LVDC CS would go a week or two, the HVAC a month or two. The difference is >only because the quantities are different. >Always been effective! > >What I make serves my purposes. > >That's why I don't get involved in the methods discussions unless I get a stupid >grin on my face and decide to tweak Bob's beard again (he's so easy, you'd think >he'd learn). > >My opinion is, these people are taking a foolproof thing and trying to make it >damnfoolproof! >No such thing! >BTW, tyndall is only to prove to yourself that SOMETHING is going on when your >making it. It's a newbie pacifier. You're reading too much into it! > >That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it! > Chuck >2+2=5, for moderately large values of two ! > >On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:57:10 -0400, Solar <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Another one I forgot to ask. How is it as far as storage stability? I >>have tried many techniques, but none of them seem very stable. They >>all develop "fallout" in a few days, with the tyndall all but going >>away after 2 weeks or so. > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
