Before you give up on this particular (g) theory, try doing the bubbling while putting a current through the DW; perhaps stainless steel (yummy, love that nickel!) or carbon electrodes? or more seriously use a permeable membrane such as good ol' cellophane to trap ions out of the DW. Similar to but a bit more effective than the "bagging"suggested to reduce silver oxide. Take care, Malcolm
"John A. Stanley" wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (John A. Stanley) > wrote: > >There has been concern expressed on the Yahoo CS Group (formerly CS > >Club) about bubbling introducing things that would form silver compound > >contaminants during CS generation. I wouldn't think LVDC would be enough > >to make any nitrogen compounds. Could using a bubbler make undesirable > >levels of silver oxide? Or wee tiny amounts of silver carbonate? > > Well, I took their advice and ran my bubbler through DW for a few hours > to see if there would be any changes. They predicted increased tyndall > and higher readings on a meter. The starting DW registered .8 on the > Hanna PWT and there were a few random sparklies but no tyndall. After > bubbling for four hours the sparklies/tyndall were unchanged and the > water registered .6 on the Hanna PWT. > > Of course, different things could be happening while current is flowing > through the water, but I can't help but think this issue is about as > important as worrying about .999 vs. .9999 silver. The bottom line is > that my bubbled CS works. > > -- > John A. Stanley [email protected] > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
