As always Jason you are quite the independent thinker. I have been impressed enough with your prior testimonial and the Altcancer site to order their mysterious OH product. That bit about Pentium II's and III's has rung an alarm bell. Could be coincidence, but ever since spending much more time than previously next to my PII machine, have been experiencing increasing neuralgic headache and vague, shifting aches and pains. Other listers posts about trouble from exposure to monitors and fluorescent lights also come to mind. Time to take EM pollution seriously! Your work with the likes of scalar-wave and holographic technology is way beyond my experience, but I certainly hope you obtain success and will be keen to follow your progress.
regards, Kevin Nolan ----- Original Message ----- From: "AVRA / Jason" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:42 PM Subject: Re: CS>Cancer: cause and cure > Kevin: > > I agree with your thinking. When one central cause for something is usually > found, then one central cure usually suffices; vitamic C always cures > Scurvy. > > That is why my primary and fundamental method of treatment is based in > natural medicine. Oxygen treatments don't always work, that is for certain. > You move the body toward a state of improved health, while addressing > identifiable and treatable conditions directly. > > I believe the oxygen issue is a symptom of a cause, not a cause. I believe > the PH issue can be both a symtpom and a cause. I believe the DNA issue can > be a symptom and a cause. Solvents and other chemicals in the body can be a > cause. Radiation can be a cause. Deficiencies can be a cause. > Electromagnetic pollution can be a cause. > > In all of my experience with cancers, the one central theme I have noticed > is that all cancer has been demonstrated ( to me ) to be an immune system > deficiency. I've heard it said that cancer can be an immune system > over-response, but this is not my experience. > > Dr. Robert O. Beck's research makes the most sense to me, as his > observations fit soundly with all the symptoms and causes of cancer that I > am aware of. The central problem is cell differentiation, the causes are > multitudinous. > > If it is a DNA problem, then the cancer will have to be destroyed, or the > DNA repair mechanisms corrected. If the DNA is shortened, how are any of > these so-called cancer cures going to affect an absolute change, without > eliminating the cells? The answer is that they aren't. The individual is > going to die, despite internet websites touting six hundred thousand cancer > cures. There are very few researchers capable of direct DNA repair. What > about modified DNA? Oxygen therapy isn't going to correct this, neither is > a proper PH balance. The cancer is going to create the conditions that > promotes its own survival, and it is VERY capable of doing so, as it is a > primitive cell structure. The body is not going to recognize the cancer as > an invasive agent. The dead person won't be able to tell the world of all > the failed alt cancer cures tried, and the families are usually to > embarrased to speak out. > > The ongoing DNA repair work, on many levels, shows extreme promise. The > methods are through scalar wave technology and other multi-dimensional > energy approaches. I'm involved in some aspects of this type of research, > which is still years away from true practical application. Sonic waveforms > show great promise. The problem is that the technology that can accurately > measure subtle forms of energy is just now becoming readily available. The > technology allowing complete measurement of DNA sequencing has also been > slow to surface. The problem here is that weapons applications has kept > much of this technology non-commercial. Since it costs hundreds of > thousands of dollars just to obtain the basic equipment needed, independent > research has been very slow due to a complete lack of funding outside of > defense applications. Those involved in such research applications ( myself > included ) cannot share too much along these lines, because the hundreds of > thousands of dollars in measurement equipment rapidly translates to millions > of dollars in applications equipment... If the primary interests are not > protected, then there would be no research at all. True, repeatable medical > applications are still quite a ways off, at any rate. But it really is > something to keep an eye out for in the future. > > If the cancer cause is through something like heavy metal poisoning, the > body must be stimulated to be able to cleanse itself. That is the ACTION > that needs to be taken, and I'm sure that many of the suggested treatments > accomplish this. If one has severe organ deficiencies, without correcting > this, the therapies will also be largely innefective. Some may be > dangerous. Chelating the metals out can sometimes cause more damage, as > they can simply dump the heavy metals back into the active metabolism. > Liver and kidney function must be supported at all costs. > > If the cause of the cancer is some sort of electromagnetic pollution, this > really needs to be identified. Watch out for the Pentium II and perhaps > some III intel chipsets. I recently had to work with one for almost a year; > they are absolutely terrible. It may be only a coincidence, but my own skin > cancer was on the side and exactly parallel to the mainboard. Having now > gotten away from that computer, I will now no longer work at a a facility > that uses them ( I build my own systems and am a strong AMD supporter, > although there is no problem with with the newer Intel > chipsets/processors ). I believe that the human biological > electrical/electromagnetic system, if the body is strong and healthy, can > compensate for many types of electromagnetic pollution. The problem comes > in when there are deficiencies involved. > > One's best bet, as far as I'm concerned with cancer, is to ignore the U.S. > multi-million dollar Alt-med cancer cure industry all together ( it's just > as corrupt if not even more-so than allopathic medicine ) and start with > Alpha Omega Labs. James Carr has 15 years of extensive experience with > cancers. If his products are not the ones to take, he will straight up tell > you. He will also tell you that based upon thousands of cases, one often > needs a product that directly kills the cancer, as well as changing the > internal conditions of the body. You can't beat an unconditional money back > guarantee for products that are designed to work quickly. Read his FAQ > section, and especially his article on "vitamin B-17". When I read this > article, I knew James was the real thing, as he is not a strong supporter of > apricot seeds as a cancer cure. > > That's my 42 cents on the subject! > > Jason -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
