Good Post, Duncan .... Thanks! Quack Watch means "Watch the Quack" ... Barrett is a quacker from the git-go! Most of the doctors that I know have nothing but contempt for him......... gives them a bad name. From a professional viewpoint, he is a ..... (you name it) ...! Namaste: Bob Bartell
-----Original Message----- From: Duncan Crow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 3:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>Cancer: cause and cure Steve Barrett is a nobody who is attempting to discredit a two-time Nobel laureate and his decades of research by shabby sniping consisting of a poorly thought out armchair outburst of "hooey" that he only hopes the uninfomed public will swallow because of the sheer size of his website. Smacks of penis envy. More on Setve and his organisation's antics on www.savedrclark.org What the self-proclaimed "expert" (he has been denied expert status in court) shovels as truth leaves out the meat of the argument. As Otto Warburg proved, to get his two Nobel prizes for precisely this research, anaerobic fermentation of cells will result in cancer. Reversing this process is accomplished by thousands of M.D.s in clinical settings all over the world. It works, and it works reliably, despite Steve's desperate bleatings. If indeed Mr. Barrett understands the process at all, he deliberately misrepresents it as he does many other, practically all other, modalities on the quackwatch site, including many others that produce stellar results.. OK here's the lowdown: Although tissues are bathed in oxygenated blood, it's the process of absorbing the oxygen through the cell wall that is impaired in a cancer situation. Oxygen does not diffuse in, it must be carried, so of course the petri dish argument of it being exposed to room oxygen is out too. If the cell membrane voltage drops too low, there's not enough voltage difference between the outside and inside of the cell to facilitate easy exchange of the oxygen and other nutrients with the waste inside the cell. As Otto Warburg pointed out, ANYTHING that interferes with cell respiration i.e. anything that encumbers the respiration by dropping membrane voltage, will result in a lack of oxygenation. This anything can be toxins within or without the cell, and also can be body pH, which if low, results in systemic oxygen shortages. As an aside, membrane voltage can be at least temporarily restored through some of the electronic and magnetic frequency devices, and in practice this has been proven out (Priore, Rife), allowing the cell to respire normally again, chuck the toxins, and absorb oxygen. I know about the infection connection, but that does not explain the success obtained by either zapping, or the Beck blood electrification, neither of which kill systemic bacteria. The blood electrifier's effectiveness on bugs is within the bloodstream only, and the zapper's power is much too low to produce voltages needed to kill things in the body. However it starts, lowered cellular oxygen disables the natural DNA repair mechanism that every cell contains. Without this natural DNA repair mechanism, all aerobic life would have cancer and the species would not survive. The lowering of oxygen to 40% of optimal will not kill the cell outright because the cell has the ability to survive by fermenting sugar anaerobically rather than burning both sugar and fat aerobically. If the DNA breaks, from free radicals produced, you have cancer. Raise the intracellular oxygen levels somehow, and the DNA repair functions again and the cancer starts to shrink as cells are normalized. Restore cell membrane voltage potential and cell respiration is done in several ways; Hans Neiper uses cal/mag/potassium to force an effect by raising extracellular pH, which allows more oxygen to be carried through the lymph to the cells, and the alkaline mineral also favourably influences the difference between inside and outside voltage of the cell, which facilitates oxygen and wast exchange. We already practice this as a preventive. Recent studies for example prove that colon cancer statistics are dramatically reduced by adding calcium supplements to the diet. And many of us are proactively monitoring saliva pH. As an aside, The sugar connection is being used as we speak; inducing hypoglycemic shock through dietary mods, and then inulin injections, is being used to kill cancer cells outright. Another way this is being used is dietary mods and a substance that prevents the liver from producing sugar so all it can produce is oils, which normal cells can live on and cancer cells can not. Sure there are more arguments on the valididy, but not today ciao Duncan -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
