Last year I had a prostrate infection and I was using CS and the Zapper, big time. I noticed minor problems with food digestion until I started using yogurt, etc.
John ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:32:06 -0400 >> Janis wrote, >> >> You said: >> >> <<Don't worry guys shortly I will be off this list because it is starting to >> depress me badly all the hokey ideas like CS does not differentiate >> between them, but does differentiate between the different medias, so >> the intestinal bacteria are safe. >> > >What is hokey about it? Science is done by doing experiments and looking at >the >results. Knowledge is gained that way. We are not talking about ideas, but >scientific tests that have been done to determine what the truth is. I have >paid University of Tennessee do a number of these tests myself to determine >what >is fact. > >First of all there is no such thing as good and bad bacteria. There are >aerobic >and aerobic bacteria, which some people call good and bad, but it is a >misnomer. Most bacteria can switch between aerobic and anaerobic depending on >the environment. If there is free oxygen available then most bacteria will be >aerobic. If they are cannot become aerobic, such as botulism, then they are >killed by free oxygen. If there is insufficient oxygen available, then they >switch to anaerobic metabolism. This is not an idea, it is not hokey, it is >proven fact. > >Now, is the bacteria in the intestines good or bad? Usually they are good. But >if you take these same bacteria and let them grow in the vagina, they cause >infection, inflammation, and if they get up into the wrong parts, can cause >sterility. So that means that they are bad. But they are the same bacteria!!! >They are good if in the intestines, bad if in the vagina, and deadly if in the >blood. That is why the VietCong rubbed their bullets in stools, the good >bacteria in the stool is deadly in a wound. Likewise tetanus and a host of >other bacteria are deadly if you get them in your blood, but in a pile of dung >does a good job of breaking it down into harmless soil. > >So how could CS differentiate between them if they are the same? The answer >is, >it doesn't. ANY bacteria that CS comes in contact with will be killed. We >have >done tests that have proven that CS kills every bacteria we tested it with, >including what is normally in the intestines, as well as what normally causes >diseases. What we found though is that the particles MUST have good mobility >and come in contact with the bacteria. If you mix CS into a solid matrix (most >of our testing was with gelatin but the contents of the intestines are also >mostly solid) we found that the particles do not move around, and the bacteria >are not killed. If we heat it or thin it down to a liquid, they are killed. >Thus >the majority of the bacteria in the intestines can survive fine since they >never >contact any particles. If you thin the contents down, for instance if you have >a bad case of dysentery, then CS is quite effective in the intestines. This is >great news for how it works and when it kills. > >So why would this depress you? I can't think of a better mechanism for killing >what is causing problems, and not killing what is needed. It isn't hokey, it >is >scientifically supported fact. > >Marshall > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
