Yes, I would want to know if the RN was black. Marshall
gmac wrote: > I have reposted this from another list. > Any comments?? > > Grant.. > Another approach. Worth exploring, and inexpensive. GET SMART > BEFORE USING IT THOU!!!!!! > I'm not a real fan of CS, as I saw what daily use does to the > Red Blood Cells (RBC) in the Naessens Ultra-Darkfield Microscope Live > Blood Screening. An RN asked my to let her see her blood. We did, and > the RBC's looked like they had been hacked or sliced with a razor > blade. When I saw them, I was alarmed at what I had never seen > before. It was obvious that something bad was going on to her RBC's. > Then she told me she was and had been using a single dosage CS solution > on a daily basis, for some time. She agreed that the picture was NOT > GOOD!!!!! Three days later, she asked again to look at her blood -- > it was improved, but still had damage to a larger percentage of RBC's. > She had discontinued using the CS. > Since then, I have been told by a competent Microbiologist, who > specializes in the Naessens Blood analysis, that what we saw was > classical Cell Wall Deficiency. Since then, it has been suggested by > competent medical personnel, that taking CS is akin to Antibodics. Get > on them heavy for a short period and then totally off. Makes sense to > me, as I've also seen the disastrous effects of long term med's. I > doubt that consciously, I will allow any antiboditics for me for longer > then 7- 10 days. If the job isn't done by then, there is probably very > little chance of ever doing the job, and the long term NEGATIVE side > effects of antiboditics can be disastrous. > NOW, having said that, REALLY GET YOUR Doctor to LEVEL with you ON > ALL THE BAD POINTS OF THE ANTIBODITICS they are loading you with. > They OWE you that much ----- Remember, they are only consultants to > you, NOT a Dictator to you. Also remember, the dianogistic accuracy for > things like LYMES, CFS, FIBERMIALGICA, etc., are probably less than 10 % > accurate --- that means one out of ten chances of correct diagnosis. > That is not just pretty bad, that is totally unsatisfactory. What > would your doctor do if his or her car only stared one out of ten times > they turned the ignition key. OR their telephone only functioned one > out of ten times!!!! NOTE, it is stated, that The Mayo Brothers, at > the height of their proficiency, with all their cases, only approached > 50 % correct diagnosis, back in the late 30's. There are much data > and writings that back up the above. Just interview the many ladies who > have been down the route. > I'll be sending some of the info on studies of reports on the Doctor > caused ( Iatrogenic ) deaths in the USA. A recent article stated, that > one in four beds in the UK are occupied by patients harmed by their > medical personnel system. > Western Medicine is in a death spiral -- Wait until the data is > released on the exodus of qualified Nurses, and the replacement with 10 > day wonders, called nurses aides. The stories I'm aware of from > nurses and Md's in the states, has convinced me that if I need a > hospital, I'll pay my own and go to Old Mexico --- I've toured two > facilities down there,and that is my choice. > I really dislike finding out about these problems, but, I fell it is > only just to tell it like I see it. Don't take my opinion, check it > out yourself. > Have fun, be healthy and happy, ed. > PS Have you purchased Dan Haley's Book " POLITICS IN HEALING " > yet??????? > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
